AEfx
Well-Known Member
Because, as McDonald's is now finding out, too many items on the menu is a bad thing. At WDW they discovered that too many restaurants is also a bad thing. The idea is to maximize profits while offering a reasonably healthy menu. I specifically chose Mickey D's for this comparison because that's a good comparable for the general quality of food offered at WDW. Mickey D's has realized that four different versions of the Quarter Pounder is too many. Now, you're going to have just one Quarter Pounder.
That's just not what is really happening, that USA Today article I believe you are going from didn't have all it's facts right (and ignored some of the ones it actually did get right). A couple of years ago they made the different QP's with different toppings different menu items, they didn't sell well. They took the most popular choice and plussed it up, it's now the Bacon Club something or other (that you can get with chicken or a QP that adds Big Mac sauce) that has been hugely successful (I admit, it's pretty darn good). That isn't going anywhere, they simply aren't putting it in the QP category even though that's essentially what it is.
And, as the article actually pointed out but didn't connect apparently, McDonalds is rolling out their "customize your burger" thing - in 2,000 stores to start (far more than their average test which is usually only in a few cities, which shows an intention to go forward with it) which will basically duplicate what was available before with the different QP's - but keep it as one menu item. It's the overall physical amount of individual menu items that is being reduced, but the options will essentially remain because you will then be able to create them - so in fact, folks will end up with more options when all is said and done.
In any case, too many menu items at McDonalds doesn't correlate at all to too many restaurant choices at WDW - you would be hard pressed to find anyone who would say they wanted less choice at WDW or would find it confusing in the same way that an overly large single menu presents. That's what leads folks off-site who don't trap themselves there.
WDW had way too many restaurants that were selling nothing more than variations of the same menu items so they closed those redundant eateries.
Really? I can get a taco salad somewhere else? Man, please tell me where!
I think folks have realized that when you have giant turkey legs, churros and fresh fruit available at the carts, the restaurants are not needed for an epicurean experience. Sitting down while eating is over rated.
Some people complain about the long wait in the standby queues but if you buy some cart food and eat it in the queue you're killing two birds with one stone and maximizing your time in the parks.
While undoubtedly those turkey legs are popular, I think there are an awful lot of folks (myself included) that think they are pretty disgusting even to look at, much less eat, and even among those that like them, I doubt they want to eat them every meal of their visit. I wish I knew what Disney had against hot dogs - a traditional stand food - they probably don't want to deal with toppings.
I also think you'd be in the severe minority about not wanting to be able to sit down and eat - not only because walking and eating isn't great for digestion, but also because it's one of the few times you can really take a break and sit down and relax in some air conditioning for a few minutes, reconnect, etc. It's fine once in awhile, or for a snack, but it's simply not what the norm of what folks want in a meal.
We all know what the real reason is - they want people to schedule their now ridiculously priced character meals, six months ahead of time. I never used to complain about WDW food prices, coming from the North East they seemed pretty reasonable compared to what we pay at home, but prices on a lot of these meals have nearly doubled in the last decade or so for barely OK buffet or pre-plated food.