DonaldDoleWhip
Well-Known Member
What can I say - it worked. It's really no different from Food and Beverage's strategy ever since the DDP rose to prominence.How high will the maintenance fees climb when there's no or very few non-DVC rooms bringing in revenue for it? The maintenance fees, coupled with the average per stay over the life of the DVC contract is always what's kept me away. Same old argument for/against DVC I know, I just sometimes feel as though the per night rates are inflated mainly to drive folks to DVC just because of the perceived value those high rates create.
That might be one of the reasons why this DVC influx has harmed WDW beyond repair - they need the rack rates (and even the post-discount rates) to be as high as they are, so DVC makes sense to more people. In our case, it worked because we wanted some guaranteed nights at GF each year. Other people will abandon ship (which must be happening already, based on the occupancy rates being discussed).