The Sorcerer's Apprentice Season 2: International Edition

[MonorailRed]

Less bold text, and more paragraphs...they aren't your enemy...your teams post has hard to read...

Have fun in your little Greenhouse of Horrors….

Jungle Cruise - Eating humans and Scaring European Children since 2014

 

[MonorailRed]

Ok, guys, I think we should move this to the Discussion Thread.

Where we can well… Discuss it.

 

[englanddg]

Have fun in your little Greenhouse of Horrors….

Jungle Cruise - Eating humans and Scaring European Children since 2014

She has nice lips.

 

[JokersWild]

So, in a future challenge, I can make a ride based on Harry Potter, and call it a win?

No, because that has been built in not one, but two parks. Tintin has not been placed in any park anywhere in the world. There has been a movie made, yes, but that truly means absolutely nothing. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory has two movies, yet there is a ride based solely on the book in England. The same is entirely possible for Tintin.

EDIT: And I agree whole heartedly with Red. This is not the place for this kind of discussion as you, englanddg have been so adamant to uphold in other situations.

 

[DinoInstitute]

So, in a future challenge, I can make a ride based on Harry Potter, and call it a win?

That's very different...

And amen to JokersWild's post. This is really being blown way out of proportion. Cough cough

 

[englanddg]

No, because that has been built in not one, but two parks. Tintin has not been placed in any park anywhere in the world.

Wrong.

http://tintin.wikia.com/wiki/Walibi_Belgium

There has been a movie made, yes, but that truly means absolutely nothing0

Again, wrong.

Spielberg owns the rights.

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory has two movies, yet there is a ride based solely on the book in England. The same is entirely possible for Tintin.

Possible, but NOT for DIsney. Not even plausable for Disney.

 

[MonorailRed]

Possible, but NOT for DIsney. Not even plausable for Disney.

Again boys, move it to the Discussion thread.

 

[JokersWild]

Possible, but NOT for DIsney. Not even plausable for Disney.

Again, I respectfully point you towards the Great Movie Ride. An attraction that, though partnered with MGM, is made up almost entirely of Warner Brothers and Paramount films. I don't understand why it is not plausible for Disney.

And yes. Please move this to the discussion thread.

 

[englanddg]

As it stands now, no, not plausable, and this competition requires we examine the plausable.

Otherwise, we'd just make a fun coaster with Warner Bros. characters as well.

No...

Doesn't work like that.

 

[englanddg]

You stole a European IP, assumed it was not represented in a theme park (which I proved you wrong) and then assumed it would win and based your concept off that?

 

[englanddg]

You came up with nothing original, and merely built on others imagination.

 

[englanddg]

At best.

 

[DinoInstitute]

Well, first off,.....discussion thread.

And second, you are really taking it too far. It is a fun competition, no need to go to extensive lengths to prove why we didn't do anything original or allowed and we should lose.

 

[englanddg]

Well, first off,.....discussion thread.

And second, you are really taking it too far. It is a fun competition, no need to go to extensive lengths to prove why we didn't do anything original or allowed and we should lose.

All I'll say here is have a sense of humor.

 

[englanddg]

Also, admit your team cheated.

 

[MonorailRed]

Also, admit your team cheated.

England,for JDM, LG and Bryce's sake for reading …Back to the discussion forums…

 

[englanddg]

We will have to wait for JDM to weigh in.

 

[englanddg]

I must say, now that judgement is coming, I loved all the proposals.

You all ROCK!

 

[jdmdisney99]

Take to the other thread ladies and gents! I think it is okay. It is a risk that I think would pay off.

 

[englanddg]

Just so everyone knows, I'm now back from DLR and will participate in this competition as a regular competitor.

Good trip I hope?