Watching Jungle Cruise right now, and the headhunters are literally in the first 15 minutes of the film.
And I thought Disney was all about synergy.
I think I made it about 10 minutes past that scene. I couldn’t do it.
Watching Jungle Cruise right now, and the headhunters are literally in the first 15 minutes of the film.
And I thought Disney was all about synergy.
It feels like a knock off Indiana Jones or something. I'm 20 minutes in, but I'm only half watching it.I think I made it about 10 minutes past that scene. I couldn’t do it.
It feels like a knock off Indiana Jones or something. I'm 20 minutes in, but I'm only half watching it.
It feels like a knock off Indiana Jones or something. I'm 20 minutes in, but I'm only half watching it.
Disney live action has two tracks:Seriously though why are virtually all of their live action films terrible? Most of the recent animated Disney or Pixar Films are relatively good. My guess is because most of the live Action Disney films are just low hanging fruit and they re at the bottom of the totem pole under Marvel, Star Wars, And the animated Disney/ Pixar stuff.
Disney live action has two tracks:
The first has done well theatrically (financially), and will continue to be made for theaters.
- Recycle established IP through reboots, sequels, and live action version of animations (Cruella, Jungle Book, PotC, Jungle Cruise, etc...)
- Get someone to write and direct a popular children's or young adult novel and hope you hit Potter gold (BFG, A Wrinkle in Time, Artemis Fowl, etc...)
The second keeps bombing. Both at the B.O. and with critics and audience ratings. Thankfully, Alan Horn is gone, so, we hope this stops. And for now, these types of films are being sent to Disney+ (Diary of a Wimpy Kid, Star Girl, Flora & Ulysses.) These films need the tight quality control that Pixar and DAS now have, rather than hiring some director to do their own thing.
Right and I guess it’s that simple. They make money because they are established IP so they don’t have to be good. So it creates a vicious cycle of garbage. I also think that a remake of an animated classic is inherently at disadvantage when it comes to the creative process
I didn't really like Encanto which was disappointing, but I did think Casita/the setting was the star of the movie for sure. Got me back to thinking about the Pixar Pier Coco dark ride concept that had been thrown around on these boards a while ago—I know it's not Pixar, but I feel like Encanto would make for a great Mystic Manor-style attraction. Doubt there's space there, but ah well.Watched Encanto on Christmas with the fam. I had no idea it was coming out on Disney + so soon so I’m glad I didn’t take my son to the theatre to see it. I liked it. Not sure the moral of the story really landed but it was fun, colorful and had some catchy songs. A little too soon after Coco IMO to be released. Granted different cultures and stories but for the strong Abuela Matriarchal trope. With that said I was actually more drawn to the world and characters in Encanto but Coco had way better execution.
I’d rank the pandemic Disney / Pixar movies as follows. Please note music/ songs weigh on my choices heavily when it comes to Disney movies and repeatability. The middle 3 can probably shift around a little bit depending on my mood.
1. Encanto
2. Onward
3. Soul
4. Luca
5. Raya and the last Dragon
I liked Jungle Cruise too! It was a fun diversion that had a tangential relationship to the ride it was inspired by. A good old-fashioned blockbuster.Maybe I'm the outlier here, but I didn't mind Jungle Cruise all that much. I like Indiana Jones, Pirates, and The Mummy (Brendan Fraser version), so to have a movie that is very much in the vein of all three, what's not to like? I honestly don't think Disney feels they have to break new cinematic ground with their attraction-turned-film catalog.
It is low-hanging fruit sure, but hey, sometimes that fruit is good for what it is, and you don't have to reach that high up!
I wasn't aware of this. Great news. Their live action films are corny at best and audience insultingly dumb most the time.Thankfully, Alan Horn is gone, so, we hope this stops.
Where is my live action Black Cauldron movie?
I don't think Disney wants an imagineer with pull these days. They don't like their imagineers to have a voice unless it says "yes".What if Joe Rohde parted ways with Disney because he refused to support the idea of cloning the Zootopia E-ticket (Shanghai) for Disney's Animal Kingdom?
They certainly weren’t looking to build anything new in the park when he left, so I feel like it was definitely that they offered him a good amount of money to leave. I do wonder how that situation would’ve ended though.What if Joe Rohde parted ways with Disney because he refused to support the idea of cloning the Zootopia E-ticket (Shanghai) for Disney's Animal Kingdom?
If you're talking about the one about the Hall of Presidents, I think the interviews that weren't from the archives were filmed mostly in late 2019 and early 2020.Carmen Smith has good things to say about Great Moments with Mr Lincoln on “Behind the Attraction.” Looks like it’s safe. Unless of course these episodes were filmed before 2020 when everything became racist. Then all bets are off.
Carmen Smith has good things to say about Great Moments with Mr Lincoln on “Behind the Attraction.” Looks like it’s safe. Unless of course these episodes were filmed before 2020 when everything became racist. Then all bets are off.
It's just amazing to me that Carmen Smith was a complete unknown outside of the company, and then in 2020 becomes the public face for every change happening inside Disneyland.
Like, did any Disney fan know who she was until the Splash announcement?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.