Yeah...sadly the majority tends to win with things like this.Each to their own and all that.
Many guests also like Frozenstrom.
Yeah...sadly the majority tends to win with things like this.Each to their own and all that.
Many guests also like Frozenstrom.
Unless it’s AE.Yeah...sadly the majority tends to win with things like this.
It’s awe-inspiring the first few times. It’s a 30-45 minute hassle thereafter.This is correct, but it is also one of the more complained about aspects of MK. I would assume this is why it was not done at any of the other parks in WDW.
We're not all gonna fit... is what I thought while boarding and we slightly didn't. Too close for comfort in the summer morning.It’s awe-inspiring the first few times. It’s a 30-45 minute hassle thereafter.
If Disney wanted more park view rooms at Magic Kingdom there are still plots around seven seas lagoon. The Venetian plot and you could always build a resort at the TTC. An elevated resort above the ferry dock like the Miracosta or DLP hotel would add to the big reveal across the lagoon
That green screen spill smhRumor: Disney to theme the Epcot entrance hotel to this adorable star of Journey Into Your Imagination!
View attachment 544172
(What, you thought it would be that annoying animated little ******?)
Interesting. I love going to MK by boat or monorail, but since I only go to WDW every few years, it probably has less of a hassle-factor for me than for someone who goes much more frequently.It’s awe-inspiring the first few times. It’s a 30-45 minute hassle thereafter.
Interesting. I love going to MK by boat or monorail, but since I only go to WDW every few years, it probably has less of a hassle-factor for me than for someone who goes much more frequently.
Or the commando style “touring”. It was supposed to be a leisurely start to a leisurely day. Even if you were spending multiple days at Walt Disney World there was a focus on activities outside the park. The hotels even had brochures for places like Cypress Gardens.I think that's the thing.
I don't believe it was designed thinking that people would go multiple times a year.
Or the commando style “touring”. It was supposed to be a leisurely start to a leisurely day. Even if you were spending multiple days at Walt Disney World there was a focus on activities outside the park. The hotels even had brochures for places like Cypress Gardens.
Yep. My first visit was in 1976, age 10. We stayed off site and visited Cypress Gardens and Sea World in addition to WDW. Some key memories include the water ski show at Cypress Gardens (funny how that is the only thing I remember about that park), and the dolphins and Shamu at Sea World (the dolphin names were Cindy, Sandy and Aphrodite, IIRC. I definitely remember Cindy as that was the name of a girl I liked at the time).Yeah. My first ever trip to Disney was when I was four or five -- I don't remember very much about it beyond loving Pirates of the Caribbean and EPCOT in general, but it was before Disney-MGM even opened so it was just the two parks. We stayed at the former Disney Inn. But Disney was only a part of that trip; I know we also went to Cape Canaveral/the Kennedy Space Center and a think a couple of other places.
People generally didn't go for a trip just to Disney World at that point in time.
And they still shouldn’t. Imho.People generally didn't go for a trip just to Disney World at that point in time.
And they still shouldn’t. Imho.
And they still shouldn’t. Imho.
Here is a rough plot I did of possible plots, in my order of practical build out:Plots, yes. Suitable for a large hotel? I know of only one off the top of my head, and I’d have to look to be sure.
There’s reasons why they haven’t been built on.Here is a rough plot I did of possible plots, in my order of practical build out:
1 - the original Venetian/ Mediterranean plot easily suitable for at least one large resort if not two
2- the TTC could be developed into a smaller lakeside resort plot along/above the ferries (think the cancelled Disneyland hotel or the Miracosta / DLP hotel) would be doable but disruptive
3- the plot of land between the Grand Flo and the Magic Kingdom another large plot
4 - the Perisan plot. More of an outlier but was planned long ago so anything is possible
5 - the island by plot 1. Least likely but could be connected to site 1 by a bridge without affecting boast traffic, think the Burj Al Arab with a tower connected to the mainland
Each of these have pros and cons and not all might be suitable for building but each plot is sized for at least a Swan/Dolphin sized resort which fits the current trend for vegas style towers.
View attachment 544612
I believe plots 1 and 4 haven't been built on because they require a lot of work to become "suitable". And number 4 would give you views of the rear of Trons show building. That's not a great view at all.Here is a rough plot I did of possible plots, in my order of practical build out:
1 - the original Venetian/ Mediterranean plot easily suitable for at least one large resort if not two
2- the TTC could be developed into a smaller lakeside resort plot along/above the ferries (think the cancelled Disneyland hotel or the Miracosta / DLP hotel) would be doable but disruptive
3- the plot of land between the Grand Flo and the Magic Kingdom another large plot
4 - the Perisan plot. More of an outlier but was planned long ago so anything is possible
5 - the island by plot 1. Least likely but could be connected to site 1 by a bridge without affecting boast traffic, think the Burj Al Arab with a tower connected to the mainland
Each of these have pros and cons and not all might be suitable for building but each plot is sized for at least a Swan/Dolphin sized resort which fits the current trend for vegas style towers.
You also have Bay lake for resorts but that’s another post for another day
View attachment 544612
Here is a rough plot I did of possible plots, in my order of practical build out:
1 - the original Venetian/ Mediterranean plot easily suitable for at least one large resort if not two
2- the TTC could be developed into a smaller lakeside resort plot along/above the ferries (think the cancelled Disneyland hotel or the Miracosta / DLP hotel) would be doable but disruptive
3- the plot of land between the Grand Flo and the Magic Kingdom another large plot
4 - the Perisan plot. More of an outlier but was planned long ago so anything is possible
5 - the island by plot 1. Least likely but could be connected to site 1 by a bridge without affecting boast traffic, think the Burj Al Arab with a tower connected to the mainland
Each of these have pros and cons and not all might be suitable for building but each plot is sized for at least a Swan/Dolphin sized resort which fits the current trend for vegas style towers.
You also have Bay lake for resorts but that’s another post for another day
View attachment 544612
So, an off-the-wall question. Are the marginally suitable areas good enough for something like, let's say, A Ft. Wilderness type resort? Small buildings, campers and RV's... no huge buildings. Then, of course, is the Ft Wilderness area suitable for development of something big?I believe plots 1 and 4 haven't been built on because they require a lot of work to become "suitable". And number 4 would give you views of the rear of Trons show building. That's not a great view at all.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.