wannab@dis
Well-Known Member
So, there should be no constraints? Is that what you're advocating for? Just for arguments sake... which do you prefer? No constraints resulting in great attraction with possible harm to the company that could take years to overcome and/or reduction of other necessary capital projects or constraints that may impact the final product minimally but leave capital for other additions or improvements?I agree.It's all in the $$$...And the people that deal it out.And in this case not giving enough of it results in attractions that are less than stellar.Not horrible but not Disney quality.
Well...Yeah...They are the ones hindering the Imagineer's no?Or are you saying we should blame the imagineers for doing a crappy job?That sounds worse, IMHO.:lookaroun
Again, you can't use subjective criteria in the decision making, but you have to look at it based on objective data from years of research and market knowledge (neither of which any of us have access to).
As for your second statement, the call for someone to be fired was for "ALL" to be fired, not just executives.