Orange Cat
Well-Known Member
1. Weather
2. Elements
3. Fire
2. Elements
3. Fire
I disagree, I feel like one element is too narrow- especially for the size of the pavilions. Maybe in 1982, we start with two elements ( Maybe fire and water since those aren't present in the land), then in 2000's we add the other two along with adjusting the og elements. With 2020 being a refresh of all of them, bringing them to modern disney. We use the classical elements as an organizing concept and delve into the sciencetfic areas linked to each element. Water be a ride on the water cycle, fire be on a volanco.Four Elements might be over ambitious for this prompt. We’d need to create four sub-areas with four attractions just for 1982, to say nothing of the two later eras. Plus the four classical Elements, while a great organizing concept, are rather unscientific for Future World, except perhaps as the first part of a ride about modern chemical elements or something.
Any one element (like weather, geology, waters) provides plenty of material for this challenge however.
It would depend on how we handled "elements" as a theme. I wasn't picturing attractions for each or even divisions. In my mind I saw a fire E-Ticket, a water C-Ticket, and an exhibit space with displays on the other elements. Which would put this pavilion at the same size/scale as Imagination, Land, and Wonders of Life.Four Elements might be over ambitious for this prompt. We’d need to create four sub-areas with four attractions just for 1982, to say nothing of the two later eras. Plus the four classical Elements, while a great organizing concept, are rather unscientific for Future World, except perhaps as the first part of a ride about modern chemical elements or something.
Any one element (like weather, geology, waters) provides plenty of material for this challenge however.
I agree with this assessment. Also, what Pi and @Shannoninthemagic have said in defense of the Elements has largely assuaged my concerns about it.I really don't think we can go wrong with anything we've discussed. There's some that might be slightly too limited or come with added challenges to make them feel unique, but nothin we couldn't handle. I really am game for anything and confident we could make something really special with whatever we choose!
Could still workYeah my top three are still the same. I’m not feeling elements. It’s a little abstract. I would like it in modern Epcot. I don’t like it for EPCOT Center.
Imagination is a little abstract too and it worked ( untill they f-ed it up)Yeah my top three are still the same. I’m not feeling elements. It’s a little abstract. I would like it in modern Epcot. I don’t like it for EPCOT Center.
Yeah my top three are still the same. I’m not feeling elements. It’s a little abstract. I would like it in modern Epcot. I don’t like it for EPCOT Center.
I like this as a ride concept. I’d rather our focus actually be scientific, (geology in this case).in my mind I picture the pavillon taking place in a volcano/deep underground where the elements (water, fire) would be the most effective. Imagine being an ant during a storm or an eruption
My votesI think we should aim to decide by tonight
I think so!!Should we rally up where we all stand soon? Prime Minister?
Hulk’s present feelings:
1. Geology (Inner Earth)
2. Weather
3. Mind/ Emotion
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.