CaptainMichael
Well-Known Member
Yepbruiser659 said:
Not this one, sorry.:wave:bruiser659 said:
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Tarzan Rocks Theater Construction
- Thread starter peter11435
- Start date
Most of you posts seem to have been questions. The only thing you said and were right about was that Disney would buy Pixar. And to be honest there was little doubt about that.bruiser659 said:
bruiser659
Member
why cant no one post anything on this site without an aurguement?
CaptainMichael
Well-Known Member
Argument? Who is arguing? You sad something wrong, and I corrected you.bruiser659 said:
bruiser659
Member
When the LUCKY thing comes true you will say ,man whos that guy.
CaptainMichael
Well-Known Member
Lucky was at Disney's Animal Kingdom then left during the summer to go to Hong Kong Disneyland for the grand opening. We don't if or when he'll ever come back. But it is safe to say that someday we will probably recieve something similar but more advanced.bruiser659 said:
Your trying to tell us that we shuld believe you because you have always been right. So whats you source about the Lucky thing?bruiser659 said:
lunalovegoddess
Well-Known Member
Thank you for posting the construction pics. While I regret that I have never been able to see Tarzan Rocks (it had always been a choice between seeing that or Festival of the Lion King), I look forward to whatever is in the planning stages right now.
Thank you for posting the link to The Wild. (personally, I think something like that would be a good fit for AK. I've always wondered why Tarzan Rocks was not located in the African section of the park. It didn't make as much sense in Dinoland. But, moot point...) I didn't even know that the movie was coming out in the spring. I appreciate your input.
Finally, I agree with M:SpilotISTC12... Animal Kingdom needs a full-service restaurant. On the opposite side of the park is the Rainforest Cafe, which is independently owned. It would make sense to have one located across the bridge from Everest. To me, the area was a buffer zone between the two lands, so it would be in a very good location.
If not a restaurant, I have an idea: collect a bunch of Australian animals and turn it into the Wonders of Down Under exhibit. Or call it the Walkabout. Animal Kingdom already has kangaroos, wallabies, flying foxes, crocs, etc. What if the area included sugar gliders, koalas, platypi, kookaburras, an echidna, the kiwi bird, and the frilled lizard, for example? Or, for the animals that would not do well outside of an actual zoo, have pictures of the tasmanian devil and the thylacine (the extinct tasmanian wolf). With the right kind of theming, and having small marsupials on display, it could be very popular. I'm thinking of something similar in concept to one of the zoo exhibits that I've seen.
Plus, I know people that have suger gliders for pets in Aus.
Potential problems:
a) availability of animals
b) care and feeding of animals
c) training for the handlers
d) enviroment
(if it is a temperature controlled building, though, this may not be a problem at all.)
Thank you for posting the link to The Wild. (personally, I think something like that would be a good fit for AK. I've always wondered why Tarzan Rocks was not located in the African section of the park. It didn't make as much sense in Dinoland. But, moot point...) I didn't even know that the movie was coming out in the spring. I appreciate your input.
Finally, I agree with M:SpilotISTC12... Animal Kingdom needs a full-service restaurant. On the opposite side of the park is the Rainforest Cafe, which is independently owned. It would make sense to have one located across the bridge from Everest. To me, the area was a buffer zone between the two lands, so it would be in a very good location.
If not a restaurant, I have an idea: collect a bunch of Australian animals and turn it into the Wonders of Down Under exhibit. Or call it the Walkabout. Animal Kingdom already has kangaroos, wallabies, flying foxes, crocs, etc. What if the area included sugar gliders, koalas, platypi, kookaburras, an echidna, the kiwi bird, and the frilled lizard, for example? Or, for the animals that would not do well outside of an actual zoo, have pictures of the tasmanian devil and the thylacine (the extinct tasmanian wolf). With the right kind of theming, and having small marsupials on display, it could be very popular. I'm thinking of something similar in concept to one of the zoo exhibits that I've seen.
Plus, I know people that have suger gliders for pets in Aus.
Potential problems:
a) availability of animals
b) care and feeding of animals
c) training for the handlers
d) enviroment
(if it is a temperature controlled building, though, this may not be a problem at all.)
pat_naughty05
New Member
I still don't get why Tarzan Rocks had to close. I was at Disney this summer, and the show was packed! Sorry if an explanation has already been given, but does anyone know why this happened?
NitroStitch
New Member
Legacy said:
I guess with either wonderful show, they couldn't even wait for the body to get cold.
It's sad enough to lose them - couldn't we just have a moment to grieve? :veryconfu
Thanks for the commentary.warlord said:
Mecha Figment
New Member
T-i-doubleguher said:That is the biggest copy of Madagascar in the World!!!!!:brick: Even some of the characters are the same
actualy let me clarify something for you. Even though Madigascar came out first. It techicaly is a copy. Call of the wild was writen by the same guy who wrote madigascar. He left the company and CAll of the wild stayed with walt disney. dreamworks hired him, and he had inside info about the company going ahead with his script. So he wrote a new script which became madigascar. And they rushed it into production to make disney look bad. Disney took their time, and both productions were goign on at the same time at one point. So don't judge so quickly.
Mecha Figment
New Member
there are two possible outcomes to the construction. and one fact. Yes the theater is being made to be inclosed because of the noise pollution it caused ruining the atmosphere of the park, and second for the show it will hold.
It is goign to be one of these two possibilites.
I've heard both as fact but we all know thats not true.. which tells me it's one fo the two.
1. Tarzan will be returning but in a new format and show.
2. it will be a Nemo attraction : which is something that quite a few cast memebers are very detested by the idea. A lot ,, and I mean a lot of people at the animal kingdom are ed they closed the show with not real explanation why (being a big hit with cast and guests)
It is goign to be one of these two possibilites.
I've heard both as fact but we all know thats not true.. which tells me it's one fo the two.
1. Tarzan will be returning but in a new format and show.
2. it will be a Nemo attraction : which is something that quite a few cast memebers are very detested by the idea. A lot ,, and I mean a lot of people at the animal kingdom are ed they closed the show with not real explanation why (being a big hit with cast and guests)
Legacy
Well-Known Member
I hadn't heard the first one but I would LOVE to see it come to pass... especially if they format it more closely to the Broadway version. An honestly, with seeing the popularity of FotLK, I think that less of a rock concert format would be better recieved. Tarzan Rocks always suffered from a "Love it or hate it" symptom.Mecha Figment said:
Legacy
Well-Known Member
I figured as much... ever since the first rumor of Nemo going in surfaced on these boards I have begrudgingly accepted it. Tarzan was never a popular enough franchise to warrant such an expensive attraction for long (and a show like that had to have been one of the more expensive ones on property). I'm just said to see the truly unique and creative shows being closed. But I'm sure Nemo will be popular, even though I HATE the idea of that film getting it's own show.wdwmagic said:
CaptainMichael
Well-Known Member
Sadnesswdwmagic said:
