Bocabear
Well-Known Member
I have not seen them...Site plans have been published.
I have not seen them...Site plans have been published.
Isn’t the new tower not even being built by Disney ?
That kind of works. Flightless water fowl, dolphins and swans.It'll give it some class.
is that the McDonalds hotel?Gonna post this design Michael Graves did for Singapore for the bagillionth time in this thread.
It's fairly ugly IMHOis that the McDonalds hotel?
That looks like a painful suppository.Gonna post this design Michael Graves did for Singapore for the bagillionth time in this thread.
thanks for that: Well after seeing that, it is quite frankl;y not connected to the Swan and Dolphin at all...and even has it's own pool...so technically, though in view line, it is not part of the other two landmark hotels....
thanks for that: Well after seeing that, it is quite frankl;y not connected to the Swan and Dolphin at all...and even has it's own pool...so technically, though in view line, it is not part of the other two landmark hotels....
Well, both Swan and Dolphin have their own pools, too, and yet, guests can freely use any of the other hotel's amenities. You can tell by how they're landscaping around the road that separates them, that they expect guests of The Office* to also use the Swolphin's amenities. This is also especially true since guests at The Office will be walking over to the Swolphin;s conference facilities, too.
The real question is whether guests of the Swolphin can use The Office's secluded pool.
*Placeholder name.
The Swan and Dolphin both have a lap pools, but they share the larger pool complex.
Exactly so they don't really have a say in the design like I thought.It is not a Disney hotel.
No, but they could have offered a similar deal as to the one made in the 1980s. Disney paid Michael Graves' fees for the Swan and Dolphin.Exactly so they don't really have a say in the design like I thought.
Exactly so they don't really have a say in the design like I thought.
Any insight as to if that was a % or fixed fee?No, but they could have offered a similar deal as to the one made in the 1980s. Disney paid Michael Graves' fees for the Swan and Dolphin.
I am imagining saying ‘the office’ like Sheldon Cooper says it in that episode of the Big Bang.Well, both Swan and Dolphin have their own pools, too, and yet, guests can freely use any of the other hotel's amenities. You can tell by how they're landscaping around the road that separates them, that they expect guests of The Office* to also use the Swolphin's amenities. This is also especially true since guests at The Office will be walking over to the Swolphin;s conference facilities, too.
The real question is whether guests of the Swolphin can use The Office's secluded pool.
*Placeholder name.
I wonder if someone decided to specify floor-to-ceiling windows, thus limiting the architectural options? Not saying that you can't do something interesting with floor to ceiling windows, just that it precludes a bunch of subclasses of post-modern. Economics also probably dictated the L shaped rectangular design on the limited footprint they had to work with, so we couldn't have any interesting shapes like the Swan or the Dolphin. It's unfortunate.
The new hotel isn’t just ugly, it creates visual chaos in that neighborhood of Crescent Lake. Any addition will create an instruison from the intended vision. That’s why the aesthetic language comes up as a compromise, but the best solution would be one that takes the east and southeast parts of the complex into consideration. As an example.
Any insight as to if that was a % or fixed fee?
Should we take bets on whether it’s curtain wall or window wall?It does not appear to be grounded in any real design aesthetic other than "Curtain Wall", exposed Structure, and Revit.
Should we take bets on whether it’s curtain wall or window wall?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.