BuzzedPotatoHead89
Well-Known Member
This. I’ll add that even from a selfish perspective in the event of a legal challenge it’s beneficial to have this information in the public domain for vetting. There are always going to be conspiracy theorists but it is the job of government to make information (to the extent feasible) readily available to the public in an easily understandable format. This is why in this state we have the California Public Records Act in place governing the release of public reports used to drive guidance/decision-making.Good governance does demand transparency. While something like a dashboard would not be an appropriate venue for such information, there are other more appropriate means of publishing research and modeling such as journals. The information should be shared and subjected to review like all good data. Those who are going to misinterpret it, either accidentally or more likely intentionally, will do so regardless and the absence of the information only provides support for such misinformation. Secrecy breeds misinformation.
Not embracing these principles breeds more distrust and frankly legitimate frustration, not less. I know there are many lockdown supporters on this board, but from a good government perspective it is shockingly concerning standard given the cavalier attitude many state governments have taken toward greater transparency into their state’s decision making process. With California being among the worst examples.
The only way to counter disinformation is with actual information. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and it’s clear we have too many public officials that prefer to work in the dark.