I'm not being negative. It's simply stating the truth. I don't see WESH 2 News doing a big story about the lights, it's just another Fanboy complaint about Disney. Anyone with any business sense would know that if a corporation can cut costs and still offer the same product (i.e. Studios is still open to guests), then its a win/win for the corporation because the expense of the lights is now removed from the overhead costs incurred by the park. Therefore, funds can either be diverted to other expenses, or more revenue for the corporation.
Ah, gotta love that "run it into the ground" mentality. Although I'm sure you are serious, you just basically wrote a caricature of the typical short-term (and short-sighted) "only care about the next quarter" corporate thinking that is costing many companies their reputations these days, which isn't something that is measured on spreadsheets but does have long-term consequences.
Particularly for a company who is well-known for "the details". It erodes the quality of the brand, and no amount of fancy little electronic bracelets can help that.
While in general, sadly, that is the mentality of WDW (which is why Universal is absolutely kicking it right now, because Disney can't even say - "Yeah, we may not have the latest, greatest attractions, but we still have the
Disney Difference!"), I do not think you are correct. And unless you have some insider knowledge you'd like to share, you can hardly claim it as "truth".
While I am not going to brand it "truth", my
opinion is that it would be unlikely that it is turned off for cost reasons. The most expensive, brightest spotlight in the world (at the Luxor in Vegas) cost $20/hr in electricity to run at full capacity - and those two lights are no where near as large or powerful and it's doubtful they require anywhere near the 300K+ watts that does (it can be seen from space). So let's be real generous and say it costs $10/hr to run - for the visual spectacle and impact, 20K a year isn't bad. It costs about the same as a part time CM. And again, that's a generous estimate - I doubt it costs that much, that would be the max.
Even taking into account maintenance, that's really small change for a big bang in a theme park, particularly since they can be seen from large distances outside the park. There really are many other things that could be cut that would be noticed far less. And let's not mistake it - everyone who has seen them up notices - consciously or not. They follow you until you are out of the parking lot, keeping the theming going until the last possible moment. It's one of those little extra "That's cool!" things as you are exiting the park, making a final impression upon you. One of the things that
used to make the Disney Difference.
If you are correct, that such a relatively paltry cost with such a big impact was taken down for budgetary reasons alone, then that's probably the saddest thing I've ever heard - and we've really had little but sad news for quite some time. It would be a new low.
We do know the truth that Disney is getting their perky mouse buns handed to them right now when it comes to new, innovative, newsworthy, spectacular attractions while we sit and wait nearly a half decade for a little hill with a kiddie coaster in Fantasyland to be completed (and as much as I can't wait to ride it, as SWSA was my favorite ride, even I can't pretend it's more than that).
If on top of that, we can't even get them to kick 20K a year to one of the true spectacles in the resort (the reason the spotlights are there is because they are very Hollywood, very few people see spotlights with any regularity in the rest of the world), while they are spending 1 BILLION on a program designed to solely benefit those who stay on property for the stated reason of getting them to spend just a few percent more on junk in stores because of the magical electronic jewelry - then man, Mickey just not only hung up the towel, he tossed down his gloves, left the arena, and retired in Boca.