Ginzuishou
Active Member
Sometimes I feel bad for the animatronic people in Spaceship Earth, trapped there, repeating the same thing day in and day out.
Sometimes I feel bad for the CMs that work in WDW, trapped there, repeating the same thing day in and day out.Sometimes I feel bad for the animatronic people in Spaceship Earth, trapped there, repeating the same thing day in and day out.
As far as the paperboy at Epcot, I never really felt like his facing the riders was an issue of "authentic-ness" in terms of the time-traveler theme.
In fact, I never felt like he was facing the riders specifically--I felt like he could have been on any given street corner yelling out his spiel and I was some anonymous traveler passing by. Despite being close to the ride vehicles I still felt like I was looking in at a scene rather than him looking at me.
Hard to believe they would take the time to adjust this extremely minor detail (assuming this is the reason why) when there are other things in much more need of attention.
Well, I see your point, however, when you consider that they could have taken it out completely and not gone to the expense to move it, you have to wonder why? They could have completely removed it and most of the guests would never know it ever existed before. All of us, on these fan boards, have got to start realizing the we are not the only people that go there. The few of us that even know it was in the front to begin with do not amount to a hill of beans compared to the numbers that go through the attraction everyday.As far as the paperboy at Epcot, I never really felt like his facing the riders was an issue of "authentic-ness" in terms of the time-traveler theme.
In fact, I never felt like he was facing the riders specifically--I felt like he could have been on any given street corner yelling out his spiel and I was some anonymous traveler passing by. Despite being close to the ride vehicles I still felt like I was looking in at a scene rather than him looking at me.
Hard to believe they would take the time to adjust this extremely minor detail (assuming this is the reason why) when there are other things in much more need of attention.
Here is what I got when I tried to read your mindWow, it's like you read my mind
better than
Too funny!And here's how I see you trying to read my mind
It's very much Jobs - if you look at the hair styling and the beard -- and the actual computer he is working on which is the original Apple computer shape -- BUT they purposefully don't mention Jobs, nor Apple, nor Woz, nor anyone else, since that would involve having to pay a royalty. Keeping it generic lets those who know computers instantly recognize its Jobs, while not having to pay a penny to Apple.I've always assumed it was supposed to be a young Steve Jobs, but I suppose it could be anyone who was involved in the development in the early home computers etc?
It's very much Jobs - if you look at the hair styling and the beard -- and the actual computer he is working on which is the original Apple computer shape -- BUT they purposefully don't mention Jobs, nor Apple, nor Woz, nor anyone else, since that would involve having to pay a royalty. Keeping it generic lets those who know computers instantly recognize its Jobs, while not having to pay a penny to Apple.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.