lebeau
Well-Known Member
I thought it was children of all ages...
Maybe once it was. They may even still say that. But realistically, their target demo is families with children.
I thought it was children of all ages...
Wow
Does nobody understand what i am saying
they can keep the meet and greets and the families with children stuff that SBC has (except the games) And just re theme it. i am also saying that there is enough room to build a new attraction (Never said coaster and i never said big thrill) i was aiming for a family attraction. the whole area needs to be re themed (except where goofy and dumbo is) because in this day and age there is much more that could be done (If Walt thought it was tacky and did not want it for disneyland why should it be built)
I am talking about the M&G's for cinderella and aurora that got canned. Also the M&G's from toontown are all moving to other parts of the park.
It was also attached to Holidayland, which had its own problems caused by the serving of alcohol. This is also not the first time since then that a circus land has been proposed, Dumbo's Cirusland was proposed in the 1970s to be built alongside Discovery Bay.
Frankly I think your idea of trying to force Wonderland or Neverland onto the existing infrastructure would be even worse.
I get that you're boo hooing over a theme you don't like when what matters is execution.
What am I missing?
:shrug:
First off who are you to say Storybook Circus is under the "Disney standard"? Were you an Imagineer? Were you around when Walt as alive? I severly doubt it. No one cares, you don't even know what its going to look like when its finished and you are having a temper tantrum like a 5 year old. It may not be the theme you like but there are hundreds of other themed areas to choose from. Move on and just get over it.What are you talking about execution
The plan for SBC land( as of now) is below the standard of almost everything disney has done
First off who are you to say Storybook Circus is under the "Disney standard"? Were you an Imagineer? Were you around when Walt as alive? I severly doubt it. No one cares, you don't even know what its going to look like when its finished and you are having a temper tantrum like a 5 year old. It may not be the theme you like but there are hundreds of other themed areas to choose from. Move on and just get over it.
Why both are more relevant than SBC and fit in more (theme wise) to fantasyland Forrest and be the same size as B&B or LM. and it wouldn't be forced in it would fit in easily
and if Dumbo's Circus land was proposed in the 1970s to be built alongside Discovery Bay why want it built? It was not a good enough idea.
"It was also attached to Holidayland, which had its own problems caused by the serving of alcohol." that is irrelevant because if disney truly wanted the circus he would have just taken away the alcohol
And the circus was really just a promotional tool for mickey mouse club
Why Wasn't It Built?
Dumbo's Circusland was very much a supporting act of Discovery Bay, and when that project never got the greenlight, neither did Circusland. Instead, manpower and money needed to be redirected to the exhausting EPCOT Center and Tokyo Disneyland projects.
The budget has been reallocated. There is no money to build an appropriate Wonderland or Neverland. To try and do so would require forcing it onto the existing infrastructure. Wonderland nor Neverland would make sense with big tents in the middle of them.Why both are more relevant than SBC and fit in more (theme wise) to fantasyland Forrest and be the same size as B&B or LM. and it wouldn't be forced in it would fit in easily
I think you are the first to say that the Discovery Bay project was not a good idea, because it too was not built.and if Dumbo's Circus land was proposed in the 1970s to be built alongside Discovery Bay why want it built? It was not a good enough idea.
You have the right to express your "ideas" but all you're doing is whining and saying the same things over and over. So once again Get over it.I am not throwing a temper tantrum i am just expressing how i feel this land can be "plused"(with it's current plans)( and i do have faith that disney will throw something in that land to make it better) and yes I can say it is below standard because it is we the guest who have such high expectations for things disney produces and ultimately it is the guests disney needs to please.
and who are you to deny my freedom of speech and the flow of ideas from fingertips to keyboard
You have the right to express your "ideas" but all you're doing is whining and saying the same things over and over. So once again Get over it.
I am saying the same thing over and over again because nobody can read
Is the one in the north the space they are clearing above where b&b are going to be on google earth
and are you 100% shore that this is happening and if so how do you know (what is your source)?
and why is this the only areas with a retention pond?
can you move retention ponds?
(im asking so many questions just so i know how much space will be left in mk for future attractions)
I am saying the same thing over and over again because nobody can read
Go back to school kid. :wave:I am saying the same thing over and over again because nobody can read
Execution is an important missing element. However, the combination of intersting concepts and generous budgets has got me excited about the other FLE projects. Just can't feel the same excitement about SBC when the conditions are reversed. Have my fingers crossed this isn't the MK's Dinorama.
We can read, we are just expressing ourselves by not agreeing with you.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.