As much as you still love Tomorrowland (as is) or Tron?I get the impression that sticking Tron down was the answer to all of Tomorrowland's current issues as much as I still love it.
They can't do Plectu because it doesn't promote a Disney IP. Iger has said they will no longer create original attractions.Was there nothing from any of the vast library of Disney IP that could be used to spark a new attraction?
Even going back to older versions of proposed Tomorrowland additions... Plectu's Galactic revue, etc...so many ideas and yet still nothing...What a shame to see the future-forward aspirational land become a mishmash of tired shows and outdated technology...
This is actually not a bad idea, although more attractions would be good too. If they would have put 220 in Tomorrowland then they could have bulldozed Mission Space and brought back Horizons. All hail Horizons!!Space 220 should have been in the Stitch space... such a missed opportunity to add better unique dinning to MK and re-use the building.
It is ridiculous that the Speedway has not been modernized...They built an all new one for Hong Kong Disneyland...electric cars and even some modest sets...They tore it out when they put in Small World....You know, when they realized that their idea the the Chinese people just wanted restaurants and shops and did not especially care for attractions turned out to be completely wrong and they had to start building in earnest....But what Happened to all the cars and set pieces? If it has been done and worked, perhaps they could revisit the speedway, extend the track to make it actually fun and more of a ride, and theme it properly to Tomorrowland ....for the first time since the park opened in 1971...As much as you still love Tomorrowland (as is) or Tron?
It would have made more sense if they planned to announce a complete gut and retrack of Space Mountain when Tron was finished. And what a missed opportunity to rework the speedway at the same time. Definitely a cool ride, but it feels like it takes as long to scan in to the world of Tron as it does to ride.
Not to mention EPCOT has the strongest dinning (Both QS and TS) of all of the 4 parks, while MK TS is probably only behind DHS.This is actually not a bad idea, although more attractions would be good too. If they would have put 220 in Tomorrowland then they could have bulldozed Mission Space and brought back Horizons. All hail Horizons!!
With 220 attached to Mission Space, and that a cash cow of sorts, we are stuck with that attraction for a minimum of 30 more years.
Unless, we find a way to break it…
The people mover should not be touched. At all. Don’t touch the people mover!Completely revitalize and replace the scenes on the Peoplemover...adding some scenic elements within the Space Mountain building instead of just inky blackness
Yea, I think they should demolish it and let it be annexed by Fantasyland (since they can’t even come up with a Tomorrowland attraction idea to put in the empty building they already have).If they refuse to address the speedway I would support a complete demolish and use the property for a new type attraction...
I've said it before but the Tomorrowland to Fantasyland transition is ghastly. I wish they would demo the Speedway and find a way to make the transition less jarring.Yea, I think they should demolish it and let it be annexed by Fantasyland (since they can’t even come up with a Tomorrowland attraction idea to put in the empty building they already have).
They could easily fit 2 dark rides in that plot. Alice would be a natural choice for one next to the teacups.
So no new Body Wars?? I hate you, Iger...Iger has said they will no longer create original attractions.
Did Iger actually say that?They can't do Plectu because it doesn't promote a Disney IP. Iger has said they will no longer create original attractions.
And with Disney's live-action film catalogue being underwhelming for decades and back to it after their brief heyday with the Infinity Saga, it means a lack of IPs to draw upon.
Not in so many words, but it's implied from all his public statements aimed at investors that Disney will be more cautious in spending by spending on things already popular (both in the parks and movies).Did Iger actually say that?
There was an interview years ago where he did just straight up say they were no longer going to make park investments not connected to a franchise. Oddly enough, the movie he used as an example of a good movie that wasn’t a franchise and therefore wouldn’t get an attraction was Ratatouille.Not in so many words, but it's implied from all his public statements aimed at investors that Disney will be more cautious in spending by spending on things already popular (both in the parks and movies)
He did. It was during an interview on site rather than at a podium or anything like that. He said that they were no longer going to be making attractions not tied to their current film library. That Disney had done quite a lot to build up its library and that other theme parks would kill for access to these beloved stories and characters so it would be foolish to not capitalize on that.Did Iger actually say that?
He has a pointHe did. It was during an interview on site rather than at a podium or anything like that. He said that they were no longer going to be making attractions not tied to their current film library. That Disney had done quite a lot to build up its library and that other theme parks would kill for access to these beloved stories and characters so it would be foolish to not capitalize on that.
I can see the point of saying we won't pay to license other IPs for our parks anymore, but to say that Disney no longer wishes to create a modern Pirates, Haunted Mansion, Big Thunder, Space Mountain is pretty short-sighted.He has a point
I'll let Bob know we still don't have sufficiently good and popular sci-fi future films to headline at all the Tomorrowlands.He did. It was during an interview on site rather than at a podium or anything like that. He said that they were no longer going to be making attractions not tied to their current film library. That Disney had done quite a lot to build up its library and that other theme parks would kill for access to these beloved stories and characters so it would be foolish to not capitalize on that.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.