So stitch, eh, that's a ride huh?
Would a flight of passage type ride fit, or would the space be too small for even that? Sorry if already asked.
Boo. Would've made for a nice ride type replacement. Oh well, I can still maybe bank on it being a good idea for monster's replacement.Wayyyy too small
I dont think the fish was fried.. swallowed whole..yes.. fried.. I dont think so.I thought it was axed because Del Toro has other fish to fry.
Probably the ones the kids expect.
That is why folks around here commonly refer to it as The Site That Shall Not Be Named or something similar. It is literally not allowed to be mentioned by name here on these forums.***** says they’ve already begun dismantling SGE. We got any word on this?
EDIT: Why is it censored..?
Okay then...Wow. The folks over at The Site That Shall Not Be Named must be really sensitive to what folks here and elsewhere say about them. The article about SGE starts out by reminding people that they said it would never re-open, Disney said they were wrong, and now they have been proven right. Which they actually haven't been, since nothing is yet confirmed, but whatever. Not exactly great journalistic standards to stomp your feet and say "See?!? Look at how right we were! Stop doubting us!"
That is why folks around here commonly refer to it as The Site That Shall Not Be Named or something similar. It is literally not allowed to be mentioned by name here on these forums.
Yeah I thought that was a little heavy handed.Wow. The folks over at The Site That Shall Not Be Named must be really sensitive to what folks here and elsewhere say about them. The article about SGE starts out by reminding people that they said it would never re-open, Disney said they were wrong, and now they have been proven right. Which they actually haven't been, since nothing is yet confirmed, but whatever. Not exactly great journalistic standards to stomp your feet and say "See?!? Look at how right we were! Stop doubting us!"
It’s a trustworthiness thing. That site is pretty critical about this site, and tends to overreact a ton on Twitter.Okay then...
I have to admit, I do not know The Site That Shall Not Be Named, but I am curious now.....Wow. The folks over at The Site That Shall Not Be Named must be really sensitive to what folks here and elsewhere say about them. The article about SGE starts out by reminding people that they said it would never re-open, Disney said they were wrong, and now they have been proven right. Which they actually haven't been, since nothing is yet confirmed, but whatever. Not exactly great journalistic standards to stomp your feet and say "See?!? Look at how right we were! Stop doubting us!"
That is why folks around here commonly refer to it as The Site That Shall Not Be Named or something similar. It is literally not allowed to be mentioned by name here on these forums.
I have to admit, I do not know The Site That Shall Not Be Named, but I am curious now.....
Well Don't Wish Needlessly To. COMe to a conclusion.I have to admit, I do not know The Site That Shall Not Be Named, but I am curious now.....
Boo. Would've made for a nice ride type replacement. Oh well, I can still maybe bank on it being a good idea for monster's replacement.
The Google search you have been told about should get you there.I have to admit, I do not know The Site That Shall Not Be Named, but I am curious now.....
Thanks.Well Don't Wish Needlessly To. COMe to a conclusion.
Could be an arcade, a vr, or even a small star tours style thing.. but yeah no room for an omnimover.i believe marni among others have said its pretty much a no go for any "real ride" system due to space. the footprint limits it to some kind of theater's.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.