doctornick
Well-Known Member
Because a wide open celebration of Star Wars isn’t an idea that has legs of its own and instead backs itself on the past success and popularity of the franchise. That’s actually incredibly short-term. Creating something that has creativity and unique storytelling of its own, rather than piggybacking off of the creativity and unique storytelling that people previously fell in love with, is a much smarter idea long-term. Pandora does this to an extent, albeit somewhat unintentionally, and it’s been very successful.
The problem with Galaxy’s Edge is execution. A dirty, depressing, war-torn, fascist area isn’t the most compelling idea, especially without the “frontier” story of hope and opportunity being expressed well. Beloved OT characters would not change that. They’d distract from it, maybe, but they wouldn’t solve the underlying issue. The Pixar Pier solution of adding things guests know and love to a foundationally lackluster area is not one we should be defending with our honor.
Bravo!
There may be issues with the execution of Galaxy's Edge - I haven't been so I can't comment, but the reviews are mixed rather than universally negative or positive - but the premise of having a proper setting rather than a free for all hodgepodge is IMHO a very solid design choice. The debate can obviously be over whether the setting chosen (not just timeframe but also place and how that's established and presented) is ideal or not. Personally, from a thousand miles away, it still seems to me that the biggest issue is the lack of "streetmosphere"/shows, kinetics and (free) stuff to do over how the buildings look or a lack of Han Solo. YMMV
Regarding involving characters or concepts from other timeframes in Star Wars, there are plenty of ways to do that effectively within the established conceit of Galaxy's Edge without "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" and wrecking the setting. I agree that just going Pixar Pier on the land seems like a complete overreaction.