PrincessNelly_NJ
Well-Known Member
And I'm the opposite. I like Star Wars but for me Harry Potter is more nostalgic and emotional. They don't have to throw money at it because what you have to realize is that Universal is building tomorrow's nostalgia. I actually remember more about going to Universal than I do about Disney when I went as a 4 year old.Yeah, I’m not saying I agree with the assessment that it Universal Sucks because it is not nostalgic for me. But for many people that nostalgia is a driving force in their decisions as to which park to go to. I don’t think that it is any better or worse of a reason than any other. And as great as the Potter stuff may be, its not nostalgic for most people over 30. I love Harry Potter. But the books came out when I was in my twenties, so the emotional connection isn’t there like it would be for things I’ve been watching/reading since I was a kid…..to bring it back on topic…like Star Wars.
So, no matter how much I like Harry Potter and no matter how great the rides they build are, a mediocre Star Wars land is more likely to get my money than a fantastic harry potter land. Because of nostalgia and emotional connection. That’s something that Comcast can’t throw money at. Only long and sustained growth and continued excellence over decades will get them that. I hope they can do it, because I want that competition to be there. But from that aspect, they are working with that disadvantage for the majority of the population.
I remember Nickelodeon Studios... watching my sister get slimed is something I'll never forget.