I'm not a huge Star Wars fan myself - JAWS was my thing, Close Encounters too.Seconded. I'm actually not a huge Star Wars fan - but I'll stick with what I said when Avatar was announced. Liking the ip a ride is based on on is not a prerequisite to enjoying the ride if it's done well.
I am bummed a tiny bit about a specific ip based land going into Disneyland itself where everything else is general and that its gonna close toontown. But presumably this means tomorrow land is safe as well as the subs and a autopia which I think are the more important things to save.
Probably should put it in frontierland then.But, but... Star Wars has nothing to do with the theme of Disneyland park or Hollywood studios - what does a foreign planet based on a specific ip have to do with a park about general themes or making movies? This completely ruins everything! Plus the movies are crap - just a western in space and its just gonna be star tours 3.0 and a fancy spinner.
I guess that means that Star Wars land really stinks for Universal
Star Tours can be moved, quite easily in fact.Isn't the Disneyland Star Wars land going to be away from their Star Tours? So I would assume that Star Tours will remain the same
I imagine this bothers universal about as much as fun spot does. In the same way universal bothers Disney much less than everyone likes to think.I predict this will end Universal and they will destroy all of their parks and burn Harry Potter down to the ground...
And give the Marvel rights to Disney.
I was thinking the same thing...and you also have to wonder if that 14 acres includes Star Tours or not, here's hoping that Star Tours is not included and we are getting an additional 14 acres. The Parks and Resorts panel should be interesting.Rereading the press release it say two signature attractions, not two new signature attractions. Makes you wonder.