flyerjab
Well-Known Member
Now who was it on these very boards who was adamant that the builds were at the same stage, or even that WDW was ahead of DL?
View attachment 181073
Do you know which building or structure that is?
Now who was it on these very boards who was adamant that the builds were at the same stage, or even that WDW was ahead of DL?
View attachment 181073
Do you know which building or structure that is?
Now who was it on these very boards who was adamant that the builds were at the same stage, or even that WDW was ahead of DL?
View attachment 181073
The Disneyland project has the Rivers of America issue to deal with. It's not entirely a fair comparison in terms of the beginnings of what they are doing.
I'm not studying construction pictures, clearly Disneyland is ahead (any sane person could tell you they would be anyway), but it's not like we're a year apart or anything. Why is it being made out more than it is? Aren't we simply a few months behind, and will it really matter in the end?
Nope. Just taking their time.If the pictures we are seeing have accurate dates then there is very little happening at SWL in WDW. That is what I am questioning. Have they gone back to the drawing board??
Nope. Just taking their time.
Nope. Just taking their time.
Completely agree! That would make a great location for a new DHS (or whatever it will be called) resort. Theme it in sections like TOT, Toy Story/Pixar, Old Hollywood and of course the side facing Star Wars land to SW so it blends in the background. Guests could walk across and have another entrance/exit into/out of the park, like DCA has.That's Art of Animation and Pop Century. There is actually plenty of room between that new parking area and Victory way to build a new resort if they wanted to.
Methinks that someone is foolishly hoping that Disney is going back to the drawing board to enhance the Star Wars Land coming to DHS.
It would be nice if they would add the third attraction that was cut - a peoplemover type of ride since I think would have been a wonderful addition to SWL.Methinks that someone is foolishly hoping that Disney is going back to the drawing board to enhance the Star Wars Land coming to DHS.
Well they do have Pandora / Rivers of Light at DAK in 2017, Toy Story Land at DHS in 2018, then Star Wars Land in 2019. I guess to let each area shine a bit by themselves.They aren't. That would cost them money. WDW moves at a slower pace. They have no reason to rush construction. Guests still swarm the park regardless. It's just how they run things. Taking their time should be their motto.
It would be nice if they would add the third attraction that was cut - a peoplemover type of ride since I think would have been a wonderful addition to SWL.
It would be nice if it was part of the land because 1. It's an attraction to ride and 2. It would be a nice second way around the land and finally 3. It would give you a totally different view of the land vs. Walking around at eye level.@marni1971 Is there any possibility at all that the people mover type attraction will be added back into the plans? I'm obviously not getting my hopes up, but it would just be great news!
You are special. Don't ever change.It makes some sense to give Pandora time to breathe. Still hoping it opens within a year of DL.
I very very very much doubt it.@marni1971 Is there any possibility at all that the people mover type attraction will be added back into the plans? I'm obviously not getting my hopes up, but it would just be great news!
If the pictures we are seeing have accurate dates then there is very little happening at SWL in WDW. That is what I am questioning. Have they gone back to the drawing board? Are the dates inaccurate? Or did something else happen with this project?
Well they do have Pandora / Rivers of Light at DAK in 2017, Toy Story Land at DHS in 2018, then Star Wars Land in 2019. I guess to let each area shine a bit by themselves.
There really is no need to spread out the cost, everything in that type of investment in amortized over many years no matter when they spend it or get it open. However, the sooner they get it open the sooner they hope to realize an increase in income because of it. (or even to not have a decline in income because of its absence). Spreading out the openings over a few years would be a positive marketing thing because it maintains the excitement over a longer span of time and, in the world of theme parks, these are big things, not some little spinner rides added here and there.Very true. The cynic in me is saying it's simply to spread out the costs. We're still years away from some things. They really need to stop taking their time but I'll stop whining, LOL. I'm just anxious for it all. I just feel they have so much to 'catch up' on.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.