UNCgolf
Well-Known Member
Yeah..... both lands are pretty sad in how much open space exists. For such a small park lacking in attractions already it’s a shame to use the space that way. That’s what prompted my look at the map in the first place. It almost looks like the tram tour and canyon was intentionally designed to stay? Maybe?
I don't mean to defend Galaxy's Edge because I think it has far too much wasted space and doesn't work as well as it should overall, but at least it's landscaped (to an extent) and has shops, dining, props, etc. mostly throughout.
Toy Story Land has two rides (I'm not counting TSMM since it was preexisting) -- neither of which are impressive or anywhere near the top of the list of best attractions at WDW; SDD is fine but it's a nondescript family coaster you could ride any number of places just with a unique ride vehicle -- and a QS place that doesn't even have much seating, plus some random props scattered about incoherently. And eventually a TS restaurant, maybe, if they ever decide what to do with it and finish building it.
It's one of the worst things Disney has ever built IMO. The amount of land wasted on Slinky alone is absurd. There are so many ways they could have used that land more efficiently and had Slinky plus a couple of smaller attractions, or some shops or another restaurant.