Thanks! These are the same pictures somebody posted here yesterday? or were there more in this recent twitter leak?
Same ones.
Thanks! These are the same pictures somebody posted here yesterday? or were there more in this recent twitter leak?
Thanks!Same ones.
I honestly think this is complete bs. That cantina concept art was for The Force Awakens. It was in The Art of the Force Awakens.- The Oga's Cantina aquarium (as seen in earlier concept art) was dropped by Disney. Was supposed to be an animatronic, but wasn't cost effective.
I honestly think this is complete bs. That cantina concept art was for The Force Awakens. It was in The Art of the Force Awakens.
I'm here for the facts.You realized you just defended Disney from a charge that they cut back their budget and cheapened the experience, right?
I honestly think this is complete bs. That cantina concept art was for The Force Awakens. It was in The Art of the Force Awakens.
I have no doubt they drew inspiration from The Force Awakens concept art, I know this wasn't even the only piece they showed at the presentation announcing Star Wars land, but I don't believe it was ever anything more than a place holder image to show off the vibe of Galaxy's Edge until they had a better idea and concept art for what the cantina in the land would be.Isn't it just a little possible that Disney wanted to use more references from TFA in SW:GE, which is why you see it in both...
Disney Channel is better than CNN or the BBC.
I have no doubt they drew inspiration from The Force Awakens concept art, I know this wasn't even the only piece they showed at the presentation announcing Star Wars land, but I don't believe it was ever anything more than a place holder image to show off the vibe of Galaxy's Edge until they had a better idea and concept art for what the cantina in the land would be.
Apologies if somebody already posted this ...
Via MakingStarWars, some new details on Galaxy's Edge. Here are the highlights:
- The Oga's Cantina aquarium (as seen in earlier concept art) was dropped by Disney. Was supposed to be an animatronic, but wasn't cost effective.
Me talking to Imagineers:
"What does that even mean? What is the metric by which an animatronic is considered 'cost effective'? Can you give an example of an existing animatronic that is 'cost effective'?"
The Yeti is very cost effective, just add strobe!There are examples of 'cost effective' animatronics all over the place!
View attachment 312457
Will Evermore be a good indicator for the type of immersive experience guests will find in Galaxy's Edge?
Opens later this month.
You're not wrong. Theme parks are not a money making business, believe it or not. Even for the first decade (?) of Disneyland's operation it wasn't really producing a profit. They're incredibly expensive and there isn't as big of a market as we'd like to believe. I am intrigued with Evermore since, as the guy puts it, it is a small group of people working towards something rather than a mega corporation. That said, the small group of people are a bunch of dirty, smelly hipsters and the concept isn't that interesting to me. I admire the ambition and hope it succeeds for that reason, but you're right that it'll likely only last no more than a decade, and close likely due to financial problems. Theme parks are just not a sustainable source of revenue.Honestly... people try to make something like this and it never lasts (or never opens in the first place). I'm not holding my breath.
Which one is the robot?There are examples of 'cost effective' animatronics all over the place!
View attachment 312457
Yeah like video games.You're not wrong. Theme parks are not a money making business, believe it or not. Even for the first decade (?) of Disneyland's operation it wasn't really producing a profit. They're incredibly expensive and there isn't as big of a market as we'd like to believe. I am intrigued with Evermore since, as the guy puts it, it is a small group of people working towards something rather than a mega corporation. That said, the small group of people are a bunch of dirty, smelly hipsters and the concept isn't that interesting to me. I admire the ambition and hope it succeeds for that reason, but you're right that it'll likely only last no more than a decade, and close likely due to financial problems. Theme parks are just not a sustainable source of revenue.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.