Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
It’s a joke, tony...read the thread or look stupid.*Claims to be an insider.*
*Doesn‘t know the history of Rogue One.*
Pick one.
And you didn’t answer my question: what happened with Colin Trevorrow?
It’s a joke, tony...read the thread or look stupid.*Claims to be an insider.*
*Doesn‘t know the history of Rogue One.*
Pick one.
He was let go because, officially, he had creative differences with Lucasfilm, but more likely, they hired him based on the financial success of Jurassic World and let him go because The Book of Henry bombed badly, critically and financially.It’s a joke, tony...read the thread or look stupid.
And you didn’t answer my question: what happened with Colin Trevorrow?
It’s the Holiday Special.Lol, right after you say people can like what they want and that they shouldn't tell you what you prefer is invalid.
The idea of Superman giving up being a hero because of tragedy to then finally return and save the day at the end is a pretty interesting concept.Rian would eliminate Lois Lane and have Superman live out his days on the far side of the moon.
He must be a hoot at parties.
He was let go because, officially, he had creative differences with Lucasfilm, but more likely, they hired him based on the financial success of Jurassic World and let him go because The Book of Henry bombed badly, critically and financially.
You mean it....humanizes the character?!The idea of Superman giving up being a hero because of tragedy to then finally return and save the day at the end is a pretty interesting concept.
So from an ROI perspective TLJ performed the worst out of all Saga movies? That's telling. RoS may out do it in the end. Let's leave R1 and Solo out of it for now and concentrate on the 3 trilogies. The DT dropped from a 125% ROI down to 40% and now down to 3%? Somebody is not happy.
You got a net profit reading on these? I know TFA was around $800 mil, TLJ was about $400 Mil. We'll see how RoS shakes out.
This just needs to stop
The net is the column that's labeled 1.5*Budg - .5*gross.
Take the budget figure and add 50% for marketing and other admin expenses for the true cost. Half of gross is the production company's share with the theaters. The difference is net. I don't call it profit any more because of certain individuals who nitpick the term. So, I label it just what the formula is.
Somebody help me with the math:
Disney spends $4 Billion for Star Wars.
Plus $1 Billion per park? (Is that correct?)
Loses about $50 million on Solo.
Makes $320 Mil on Rogue 1
Makes $800 Million on TFA
Makes $400 Million on TLJ
Assuming $350 Million on RoS (to be generous).
So still in the hole by about $4 Billion? Now I get merchandising and licensing and all that. Can anybody give me an accurate figure of where Disney is right now in this arrangement? 'Cause I got to think they're still upside down.
Maybe, but Rose wasn't any better. She was there to try and move Finn from running away to joining the cause. And he needed someone with him for his "mission". She really wasn't needed. The point was more that Neither guy really did anything to further either character.Maz was a plot device, not an investable character. He was simply there to get the characters from A to B in both TFA and TLJ.
Her existence in TROS was to offer a moment of cringey fan service.
Rose is a plot device. She served to advance Finn’s character. Whether you think it worked is up to you, but that was the clear attempt.Maybe, but Rose wasn't any better. She was there to try and move Finn from running away to joining the cause. And he needed someone with him for his "mission". She really wasn't needed. The point was more that Neither guy really did anything further either character.
Yes I didn't think it worked. But that's not what I was talking about. The argument was raised that JJ had done Rose wrong. He didn't handle it anymore wrong than Rian and Maz. You can't argue one side and not the other. You said yourself both were plot devices. So if Rose was a plot device in 8, then she wasn't really mishandled in 9.Rose is a plot device. She served to advance Finn’s character. Whether you think it worked is up to you, but that was the clear attempt.
The movie takes are big pieces.. but not in the grander scheme. Disney has 7 years of merchandise sales, royalties from licensees, new license arrangements (of which there has been 5 movies to sell new opportunities for). That's the golden goose that keeps going and really the big reason to push the films. New content, new opportunities, new fans.
Think back to TFA... star wars was on everything.. even makeup! Those are all dollars rolling in..
Star wars also has a history of having cool background characters that really don't amount to much. **cough**bobafett**cough** the problem you can run into, is when you pull a phasma and include them in all the prerelease stuff and talk the character up. Then they really aren't a factor. Zorii falls into that catagory. Personally I love useless secondary and background characters. It's something that has always been endearing of star wars to me. But I get when people feel let down after thinking a character was going to have a bigger roll based on the marketing push.bleh... the world isn't filled with just the lead actors and extras... its fine to have different levels of significance. She serves a purpose... Poe had history on this planet and needs connections... it would be even dumber to have Poe just stroll in and no one interact with him and he still gets the mission done.
But I get when people feel let down after thinking a character was going to have a bigger roll based on the marketing push.
Couldn’t.Finn... could care less
Couldn’t.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.