SPOILER: The Acolyte -- Disney+ Star Wars -- begins June 5, 2024

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I've said 10,000x over the last 5 years, the budgets for streaming have been way too high. So yes it was a bad idea that all of Hollywood has fallen into.

Using the Marvel linear shows, even the Netflix Marvel shows, as an example shows they know how to properly budget shows. They just need to get back to that.

There is no gotcha moment here, move on.
I don’t need any gotcha moments, Ace…the truth is winning out on key subjects

Every
Single
Day
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
It says I don’t spend just as much time here making excuses no one believes about bad management at a company with serious, long term problems.
Or it says that you only care about winning some fictitious argument on a site with anonymous people. Something I've noticed with a lot of posters you disagree with.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
The Volume was used in Thor L&T and The Batman.
I hadn't seen that, but it would make sense since so much of love and thunder looked really cheap. That's not what you want for your first star wars film in 7yrs.

The volume is great if you want to extend a alleyway or put a building in the back skyline, like they did in the batman. But most all of the batman was shot on practical sets. So if they keep it to that, ok, it's fine. But if it looks like a tv show, we're in trouble.
 

Serpico Jones

Well-Known Member
The Batman used the volume very sparingly. It was used during the scenes in which people met with Batman on the skyscraper overlooking Gotham City and for the final shot of the Batmobile chase.
 

Wendy Pleakley

Well-Known Member
The Volume tech seems very seamless to me. A lot of that footage will age better than movies where the actors are in front of green screens most of the time.

The presumably bigger budget means we should see some epic space battles. The shows have generally been limited to single ships duking it out. I'd expect to see a bunch of Mandalorians come together.

That scope is where I'd expect to see a movie outdo the TV show. Sci-fi shows will always be heavy on the virtual environments. That's not the area I'd expect to see a big difference between TV and movies.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
in case people didn't know... 'the volume' is not some singular thing anymore. You can find all kinds of videos of people building these out and using them. I wish I had the link I had in my mind handy, but I can't find it right now
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
For me, that was evident when they concluded season 2 with a CGI Luke Skywalker
Well to be fair, Luke was the only real play once they said find a Jedi. He makes the most sense because of the timeframe. That doesn't mean the movie isn't desperation to get something on the big screen asap. But I don't think having Luke in Mando was being desperate. I think Jon was just giving something to the fan base.
 

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
Well to be fair, Luke was the only real play once they said find a Jedi. He makes the most sense because of the timeframe. That doesn't mean the movie isn't desperation to get something on the big screen asap. But I don't think having Luke in Mando was being desperate. I think Jon was just giving something to the fan base.
I agree. Maybe desperate wasn’t the right word. Giving up? Lack of creativity? It came on the heels of bringing in multiple characters from other shows and movies. The showrunners created the conditions that resulted in only one option.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Slightly OT

Rumor has it that the Mouse is covered since Peter Cushing had Disney+ and agreed to the terms of service, his friend too:

I saw this and the only thing I thought, so they waited 7-8 years after the movie came out to file a suit? I mean what were they waiting on if they really had any claim, why not file it in 2017 shortly after the movie came out?

Me thinks this was originally just some suit in hopes to quickly get paid by a settlement, "Sue the Mouse, they'll settle quickly".
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member

And then people would wonder why Disney had to constantly fire more and more people:

 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Original Poster

And then people would wonder why Disney had to constantly fire more and more people:

Funny how the article says it doesn't know how much over budget it was: fifty million? a dollar? lol
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Funny how the article says it doesn't know how much over budget it was: fifty million? a dollar? lol
Does it matter... we already know the 230mil number is significant and you can frame it relative to other shows.

To know it blew it's budget before even the costly post-production is done is well enough to know it will be 'way' over budget.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom