LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
I agree, but I also think it's worth listening to those who feel differently.I still think most do.
I agree, but I also think it's worth listening to those who feel differently.I still think most do.
Add New Orleans Square as a land from the Adventureland corridor (parade start/finish) up to Splash. They can worry about theming continuity from the rest of Frontierland to BTMRR later, when Tom Sawyer’s Island is inevitably rethemed.Normally I'm with you, but I would also anticipate the replacement to be "less than" Splash. Disney doesn't typically build those 10+ minute long rides anymore. This is a situation where if it must go, I'd welcome retaining the track layout from a storytelling standpoint.
I do think Tiana is out of place in the current version of Frontierland, and if the do go through with this as announced, I would welcome an answer to that theming problem.
This really sucks frog water. Princess T. her frog and New Orleans have nothing to do with frontier land. It is so sad the magic and fun is being taken away. Why didn't they build it in America in Epcot. Really won't be the same without Zippidy Do Dah.
Both solid length, but MMRR is shorter than the ride it replaced, and both are shorter than Splash (when considering only the actual ride portion of RotR).ROTR and MMRR are both pretty long rides and they are new
ROTR and MMRR are both pretty long rides and they are new
If its SD = so what as in don't care.The Shanghai POTC is mind-blowing in person... The show scenes are massive...The overall attraction is quite impressive. Don't let the videos fool you...It is a real hit!
My suggestion was to eliminate Liberty Square as a theme and take the stretch from Mansion to Princess and the Frog a new area called "Riverfront Square" and lean into the Rivers of America / the Mississippi River.Add New Orleans Square as a land from the Adventureland corridor (parade start/finish) up to Splash. They can worry about theming continuity from the rest of Frontierland to BTMRR later, when Tom Sawyer’s Island is inevitably rethemed.
While that makes sense. My money is on them slapping this new ride in, and doing nothing to rework the surrounding area to fit a theme. This would be a time I would gladly eat crow. I just have zero confidence they actually try.My suggestion was to eliminate Liberty Square as a theme and take the stretch from Mansion to Princess and the Frog a new area called "Riverfront Square" and lean into the Rivers of America / the Mississippi River.
While I like that idea, I think many people forget that Big Thunder is its own dead end so whatever themed area Splash currently sits in would have to be stretched down there too, and retheming Big Thunder to anything else other than what it is wouldn't work because the attraction doesn't revolve around any IP or characters, its theme is the theme of the land it's in, Frontierland.My suggestion was to eliminate Liberty Square as a theme and take the stretch from Mansion to Princess and the Frog a new area called "Riverfront Square" and lean into the Rivers of America / the Mississippi River.
Part of my proposal was also to lean into a few different food concepts along the way including something... anything... that gets me the Cafe Orleans monte christo in the Magic Kingdom.While that makes sense. My money is on them slapping this new ride in, and doing nothing to rework the surrounding area to fit a theme. This would be a time I would gladly eat crow. I just have zero confidence they actually try.
So we did a hypothetical build out to 2035 on our show. My proposal also included connecting Haunted Mansion to Tom Sawyer Island to Thunder via bridges, permanently docking the Riverboat and use it for live entertainment near Splash and using part of Tom Sawyer for a new major Frontierland attraction (my suggestion was a Western River Expedition variant).While I like that idea, I think many people forget that Big Thunder is its own dead end so whatever themed area Splash currently sits in would have to be stretched down there too, and retheming Big Thunder to anything else other than what it is wouldn't work because the attraction doesn't revolve around any IP or characters, its theme is the theme of the land it's in, Frontierland.
It still could be! In WDW anyways.I wish I could go back in a time machine and tell Tony Baxter to just...stop. It could have been just "America Sings! The Log Flume"
If it does happen, which from the looks of the new statement it ain’t, they’ll make a southern bluegrass version of the soundtrack and call it a dayWhile that makes sense. My money is on them slapping this new ride in, and doing nothing to rework the surrounding area to fit a theme. This would be a time I would gladly eat crow. I just have zero confidence they actually try.
I think if it was called Huckleberry Finn Island there would be more calls for a change. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer isn't as controversial as it's sequel.So we did a hypothetical build out to 2035 on our show. My proposal also included connecting Haunted Mansion to Tom Sawyer Island to Thunder via bridges, permanently docking the Riverboat and use it for live entertainment near Splash and using part of Tom Sawyer for a new major Frontierland attraction (my suggestion was a Western River Expedition variant).
Tom Sawyer Island is the most inefficient use of space in the Magic Kingdom. I know there are absolutely fans of it, but if you're going to strip any sign of Song of the South from the parks, Tom Sawyer / Huckleberry Finn certainly are "problematic" in today's society. Disney is in the mindset that their attractions shouldn't have to be put in context and I have to believe Tom Sawyer Island is certainly on the list of future targets.
In the grand scheme of things, no it’s not. It’s only problematic to those who want it to be, who thrive on drama, wokeness, and division. Scouting out and/or inventing problems so they can feel good about themselves and absolve any guilt they may feel about past sins from our nation’s history.Whether or not YOU approve is irrelevant - both to Disney and to the conversation of whether or not the ride actually is problematic.
(It is problematic.)
I'm all about people being smart enough to put things in context, but Disney has decided they don't want guests at their parks to have to do that. There were calls for Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn to be banned long before Disney recognized Song of the South as being offensive. Regardless of your personal opinions on the matter, you have to recognize that it would be a target for Disney's sensitivity / inclusiveness team.Guys I really don't think Tom Sawyer is problematic, and I'm politically somewhere in the vicinity of the people who want SotS evicted.
The current statement does translate from corpo-speak to English as "We aren't doing it, like at all" which is fascinating.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.