I know many of the BIPOC on this thread have expressed great discomfort with how this is being marketed as "inclusion " when Black cast members and guests have expressed that they still experience discrimination, or multiple accounts of racism experienced by Black cast members of the DCA production of Frozen. I don't think it's in bad faith to ask who this is actually for. WHY do they keep congratulating themselves over this imaginary princess who spends almost her ENTIRE as a Frog when they should be prioritizing the wellness and safety of actual Black people who work at and visit their parks?!
Or were willing to have a Native American and the word "Savage" on branding that should no longer exist, let alone be visible to park guests in the NEW Confectionary. The brand name does not have to change, that is the founder's name, but to keep putting the name "SAVAGE" next to the Native American image on the machines is a bad choice all around.
This is how you know how seriously they are taking themselves when there is no money or "optics" in it. This got attention so now it will change too, but how was that not thought of when it is GUEST FACING in a place that has a Native American proprietor backstory?
Attachments
Last edited: