LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
The key thing to my mind is that the characters as they appear in the parks are the characters as known from Song of the South. There's just no getting around that. The stories' longer history seems irrelevant to me, just as the content of J. M. Barrie's play has little bearing on whether the Indian scene in Peter Pan's Flight should be changed or not.I don’t say there’s no issues with the film; but the Bre’r characters existed before SoTS, and surely should exist after that. They’re just critters. It’s the storytelling vehicles and or/devices that Disney used and surrounded them with that are what to me can be found offensive.
Let’s ask a hypothetical; let’s say that in SoTS Remus told tales of Steamboat Willie ( Mickey’s ) antics with Goofy and Donald in the laughing place. Is there doubt Disney would reject calls to eliminate rides featuring Mickey, because he happened to be used in unfortunate contextual setting in a film? Would calls to cancel Disney’s most famous character be reasonable? Why do you think Disney went through the trouble of excising every live action SoTS reference, but used the Bre’r characters? Because they’re just that, animal critter characters with no inherent racism or stereotyping. They existed beforehand in old stories, were utilized by Disney in an unfortunate film and setting, and have been used again, not just in SM.
I'm not really sure what to make of your hypothetical question. Mickey, Goofy, and Donald were already well established and much loved by the time Song of the South was made; had they (inexplicably) appeared in it, their reputations would not have suffered any lasting damage, because no-one today would associate them to any great degree with the film. (I can say this with reasonable certainty given that Mickey and pals have featured in plenty of problematic content over the years.) The Brer characters, by contrast, entered Disney's stable with and because of Song of the South; they cannot be disassociated from it.