Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
I don't see Splash happening before TRON opens.
Not a chance.I don't see Splash happening before TRON opens.
I don’t think so. They have a perfectly good reason to hold off. I’d rather get a good PatF ride than a trash one that only the most radical of Twitter shills can defend.Tbh, I want them to expedite this project. Just get it done with. The longer it sits here as the original theme, the more controversial they look....
Good point.I don’t think so. They have a perfectly good reason to hold off. I’d rather get a good PatF ride than a trash one that only the most radical of Twitter shills can defend.
Why make a princess and the frog ride? The princess and the frog's box office flop was the reason Disney abandoned traditional animation for computer animation. Walt Disney was all about the art of animation. And computer animation just isn't very good animation. Why are you rewarding this movie with splash mountain. That movie doesn't even deserve to take over Winnie the pooh.Worth mentioning that Walt Disney Imagineering mentioned Carmen Smith, an imagineer on the Splash Mountain refurb, as well as Charita Carter. This is the first official new reference I've seen to this project in months.
But Tron pausing would most likely mean they want to do WDW's version. Now if DL had paused Runway, Avengers, ect..then it would mean both are going possiblyWe’ll just have to see how it goes. It’s clear they want to prioritize the California version, but that’s hard when the California parks are closed. So who knows?
Why make a princess and the frog ride? The princess and the frog's box office flop was the reason Disney abandoned traditional animation for computer animation. Walt Disney was all about the art of animation. And computer animation just isn't very good animation. Why are you rewarding this movie with splash mountain. That movie doesn't even deserve to take over Winnie the pooh.
Worth mentioning that Walt Disney Imagineering mentioned Carmen Smith, an imagineer on the Splash Mountain refurb, as well as Charita Carter. This is the first official new reference I've seen to this project in months.
Discussion of "why" and whether one's opinion is for or against is in this thread...Why make a princess and the frog ride? The princess and the frog's box office flop was the reason Disney abandoned traditional animation for computer animation. Walt Disney was all about the art of animation. And computer animation just isn't very good animation. Why are you rewarding this movie with splash mountain. That movie doesn't even deserve to take over Winnie the pooh.
[/QUOTE]Why make a princess and the frog ride? The princess and the frog's box office flop was the reason Disney abandoned traditional animation for computer animation. Walt Disney was all about the art of animation. And computer animation just isn't very good animation. Why are you rewarding this movie with splash mountain. That movie doesn't even deserve to take over Winnie the pooh.
Not like it had much competition at all.It wasn't a flop.
It wasn't an overwhelming success, but it made money and performed better than the previous few traditionally animated films Disney had released.
Tron’s Pausing for a year, no? Spring 2021 opening. I don’t see Splash’s gutting being done by Spring 2021, let alone the entire new attraction. They’d have to start now, with the decision to leave Tokyo’s as is definite.But Tron pausing would most likely mean they want to do WDW's version. Now if DL had paused Runway, Avengers, ect..then it would mean both are going possibly
Not like it had much competition at all.
Anything that doesn’t meet expectations is considered a flop by the company. Yes, even if it makes enough money past breaking even.I'm just saying that calling it a flop is inaccurate, just like when people say Mary Poppins Returns was a flop. It may not have met expectations -- I have no idea what they were expecting, although as I said, it at least outperformed the last 3 traditionally animated films they'd released -- but a flop is something like John Carter that actually loses money for the company.
Anything that doesn’t meet expectations is considered a flop by the company. Yes, even if it makes enough money past breaking even.
It was no doubt compared to the other Princess Films. Snow White, Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Little Mermaid. Does it have the same reputation as those? No. Did it live up to those films? Regardless of what you or I think of the film, it didn’t. It’s a Flop. I like it better than Cinderella and LM, but it didn’t reach those levels of acclaim.Even if that's true, we don't know what their expectations were, so we don't know if it met them or not. I doubt they were expecting to launch a Princess and the Frog franchise, and it outperformed their other recent films, so it couldn't have been too big a disappointment. I don't believe they had plans to continue making traditionally animated films regardless of how well it performed.
I also personally don't really care how a company classifies something internally. If it turns a decent profit (i.e. it didn't just barely break even), it's not a flop, except in rare cases of giant blockbuster films that very obviously significantly underperformed.
It was up against Avatar, the Alvin and the Chipmunks sequel (somehow those films managed to make loads of money at the box office) and I think Sherlock Holmes. I'd say it had pretty tough competition.Not like it had much competition at all.
If that’s the case I hope that Disneyland doesn’t open until this time next year. If they are so clueless and out of touch with their priorities they deserve all the monetary pain they’re experiencing.Soooooo, Disney paused construction on the TRON and Guardians of the Galaxy rides, leaving them just stuck unfinished for a while, so they can do the Splash Mountain retheme?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.