Mansion Butler
Active Member
FWIW, I've heard "lap bars" from a few Splash CMs, as well, but I had thought in the state of Florida it was illegal to have lap bars on a water ride.
I'm not sure I agree there's no need. A large reason for many of Splash's downtime is guests getting out of the boats and causing problems. Sometimes the intrusion causes something that can't be reset in a timely manner.I pray that Splash Mountain doesn't get lap bars. There really is no need for them.
Nope. Ripsaw falls has them.but I had thought in the state of Florida it was illegal to have lap bars on a water ride.
It's also technically a rollercoaster, so I'm not sure if that uses any sort of loophole. Or if the whole law thing is just a myth.Journey to Atlantis at Sea World has them, so it must not be a law in Florida. :shrug:
It's also technically a rollercoaster, so I'm not sure if that uses any sort of loophole. Or if the whole law thing is just a myth.
But are they technically referred to as "water rollercoasters?" Because I didn't think so.You do realize that that is essentially what both Ripsaw Falls and Splash Mountain are, right? How do you think the second drop on Splash that also sends you uphill is accomplished?
But are they technically referred to as "water rollercoasters?" Because I didn't think so.
FWIW, I've heard "lap bars" from a few Splash CMs, as well, but I had thought in the state of Florida it was illegal to have lap bars on a water ride.
I'm not sure I agree there's no need. A large reason for many of Splash's downtime is guests getting out of the boats and causing problems. Sometimes the intrusion causes something that can't be reset in a timely manner.
60 new logs will be a tad pricey. And if the replacement process is slated to happen from May through September (not fact - just a rumor from one post above), it seems as if they're giving themselves time to take X-number of boats out of circulation at a time...retrofit them...and put them back in the flume.
This is the point I was trying to make before. Very very rarely is an entire group of ride vehicles replaced unless the dynamics of the ride, or capacity, are drastically altered. This is incredibly expensive to do, especially if it requires alteration of the ride itself and not just the vehicles.
TDO has proven in the last few years that spending for spending's sake is not a priority for them, and considering they're plopping down a hefty sum on the FYL expansion, it would seem very out of character for them to, at the same time, commission an entire new set of logs to be built for what is a relatively minor change.
This is the point I was trying to make before. Very very rarely is an entire group of ride vehicles replaced unless the dynamics of the ride, or capacity, are drastically altered. This is incredibly expensive to do, especially if it requires alteration of the ride itself and not just the vehicles.
TDO has proven in the last few years that spending for spending's sake is not a priority for them, and considering they're plopping down a hefty sum on the FYL expansion, it would seem very out of character for them to, at the same time, commission an entire new set of logs to be built for what is a relatively minor change.
It's pretty major if they could get sued for not having them resulting in buying a whole new fleet and whatever they are fined.
Since when have suitable grounds ever been needed to file a suit against Disney? Someone filed a suit claiming that a stone fell off the castle and hit them in the head. The fact that that there is not a single stone in the castle was irrelevant. Someone else also filed a suit claiming that their eardrums ruptured because of the hydrolators. Again the fact that the hydrolators did not even move was irrelevant. If the name Disney is attached to it there will always be an ambulance chaser willing to take the case for free.Considering there's apparently no law in the state of Florida mandating that rides in the Splash Mountain category are required to have lap bars, I'm a tad confused as to what grounds someone could sue them on for not having them. If it's not against the law to not have lap bars, and also considering that the ride has been around for almost 20 years and no one has yet to be thrown from it against their will, the only logical cause for someone getting out of a log would be by their own doing, which would not be suitable grounds for that person to sue Disney for lack of lap bars.
Anyways, I hope it is something like the lap bar in say Peter Pan where its one bar across with more room to move. you couldn't stand but it would give you the freedom of 3 in a row.
Anyways, I hope it is something like the lap bar in say Peter Pan where its one bar across with more room to move. you couldn't stand but it would give you the freedom of 3 in a row.
How much heavier would the logs be after this alteration? Would it cause problems with the ride?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.