The_Jobu
Well-Known Member
You can still do this via Youtube.
Oh yeah, that's exactly the same experience as sharing a treasured memory together in person. Come on now...
You can still do this via Youtube.
What about Family Guy? That show gleefully partakes in offensive stereotypes and racist jokes. Disney isn't doing anything about THAT, nor do I see anybody complaining.I would just really like to know how in the hell South Park has survived longer than Splash Mountain in today’s environment.
All signs point to "yes".Are they erasing Splash Mountain from existence? No more pins, characters, plushies, merch either?
I distinctively remember hearing some people claim Sebastian is an offensive stereotype, too, so there's that.* Little Mermaid (Lack of Diversity/Fat-Shaming)
Journey Into Imagination With Figment remaining unchanged is likely the only thing keeping them from removing Figment entirely and theming the ride after Inside Out. Disney is too cowardly to do a ride not based on a pre-existing IP nowadays.Heck, as popular as Figment is with park goers, I wouldn't be surprised to see them change the Imagination Pavilion theme to Inside Out when the time comes (although I really hope they prove me wrong on that).
Give them time.No one is clamoring to get rid of the Dumbo or Peter Pan rides. Despite the racism it shows towards African and Native Americans in their movies.
I'm fully convinced they're doing to trash the animatronics. They did it to the Universe of Energy and Great Movie Ride animatronics, I wouldn't put it past them.I don't see them keeping any of the actual AA's. They're not proportioned to fit the designs of animals or humans from the movie (unless that's not something the imagineers care about). Even if they were reskinned. My guess is MAYBE half a dozen or so new human AA's (and for Louis) if we're lucky. But most animals likely to not be animatronics, instead basic or static figures akin to most of the Little Mermaid characters. And given the people involved and recent trends, much of the physical scenery will probably be gutted and replaced with video screens.
I'd argue that Splash Mountain could be considered the characters' redemption arc. As others have pointed out, none of the racist elements from the film are in the ride (even the dialect and slang was toned down, I've noticed) - much like how none of the racist elements from the Mickey Mouse shorts that are being brought up are in other Mickey Mouse productions.Someone mentioned last night (I forget who, it's all a big blur) that Mickey shorts with insensitive material don't cause a need to "Cancel Mickey" because that wasn't the only short ever created. That isn't the only thing Mickey is known for. Characters and material change and grow over time, I think that's quite obvious. The difference with the SotS characters... is that they don't have a redemption arc. What they're known for is the only thing they're known for within the Disney IP.
You can still do this via Youtube. Also, the ride will still be there in a slightly different format.
You can explain it to the next generations
Why is everything always "virtue signaling?" I know it's a buzz word that gets repeated a lot. I find the term to be inherently dismissive. It's just a way of disparaging something without dealing with it.
Who decides what's genuine and what's "virtue signaling"? You I guess.
Why is everything always "virtue signaling?" I know it's a buzz word that gets repeated a lot. I find the term to be inherently dismissive. It's just a way of disparaging something without dealing with it.
Who decides what's genuine and what's "virtue signaling"? You I guess.
But again... should rides always stay the same? Should the parks never change?
Again... because it not offensive to you. Thats it?That's the rub. The ride is harmless and completely unoffensive. If people need to see themselves exactly to enjoy a theme park, they should ask for a new ride to be built, not take away a favourite to do it on the cheap.
You obviously do not get it.You can still do this via Youtube. Also, the ride will still be there in a slightly different format.
You can explain it to the next generations
Do you think the Disney executives woke up one day, and thought “Splash Mountain is an unpopular attraction, how can we re-theme it to attract guests to that area?”
Or,are they replying to current loud social media outrage, proving how woke they are, with a surface level showing by sticking a princess on one of their already most popular attractions?
You're making my point for me.
Of course we have the ability to evaluate the merits of others' complaints without walking in their shoes. Judges do it every day.
Earlier, the opposite was said in this thread, in defense of the initial anti-Splash Mountain complainers.
The problem is that someone, somewhere, can always find a way to be "offended" by just about anything. I have Scottish heritage and sorry but the beloved Princess Merida is a stereotype. If you loved that character how would you feel about me and tens of thousands of others bending Disney and forcing them to remove her and all Brave merchandise from the parks and from the MK Fireworks show? Or maybe I have dwarfism and do the same to 7 Dwarfs Mine train and all references to the dwarfs? What if I'm Nepalese and find the representation in Animal Kingdom offensive and petition for an entire re-theme of that area?
Sometimes you will be offended. Life isn't always fair and equal. There are much, MUCH more important things we could be doing to help poor communities to have a better future than doing a re-theme on Splash Mountain.
How about Disney take the $50 million from this re-theme and put it towards the devastated urban school systems that need it so desperately? Most people calling for this re-theme as a hugely important thing are playing a game and don't really care about helping anyone.
Go find something better to do than destroy mostly harmless entertainment attractions that many MILLIONS more people have enjoyed than have been offended by. That is, if you really care about people so much...
Again... because it not offensive to you. Thats it?
Also... on the cheap. Need I remind you that Splash is full of recycled animatronics
The problem is that someone, somewhere, can always find a way to be "offended" by just about anything. I have Scottish heritage and sorry but the beloved Princess Merida is a stereotype. If you loved that character how would you feel about me and tens of thousands of others bending Disney and forcing them to remove her and all Brave merchandise from the parks and from the MK Fireworks show? Or maybe I have dwarfism and do the same to 7 Dwarfs Mine train and all references to the dwarfs? What if I'm Nepalese and find the representation in Animal Kingdom offensive and petition for an entire re-theme of that area?
Sometimes you will be offended. Life isn't always fair and equal. There are much, MUCH more important things we could be doing to help poor communities to have a better future than doing a re-theme on Splash Mountain.
How about Disney take the $50 million from this re-theme and put it towards the devastated urban school systems that need it so desperately? Most people calling for this re-theme as a hugely important thing are playing a game and don't really care about helping anyone.
Go find something better to do than destroy mostly harmless entertainment attractions that many MILLIONS more people have enjoyed than have been offended by. That is, if you really care about people so much...
By removing ALL of the older attractions, Disney is removing things that allow parents to share pieces of their own childhood with their children in a meaningful, tangible way outside of stories and photographs. For children, a parent telling them "when I was a kid" stories are just that - they are intangible stories and difficult to imagine. Bring those stories to life in a tangible experience, and not only do adults have a connection to them, but they create a space in which they can connect with their children in ways that aren't usually possible. There is a lot to be said for something when a parent can say to their child "you know, the first time I rode this, I was only 10!"
I see it differently.
I'm guessing you're not a judge. This is not a courtroom.
I go back to my point. You don't see the difference? I find that disturbing.
That's the rub. The ride is harmless and completely unoffensive. If people need to see themselves exactly to enjoy a theme park, they should ask for a new ride to be built, not take away a favourite to do it on the cheap.
That's twice today!Well said!
Oh my goodness, we don’t usually agree on much... but your post is exactly my thoughts too
.
empathy is seriously lacking in this thread.No matter how many times you and others repeat that you did not find the ride offensive, it won't change the fact that others felt differently.
This thread would be a lot shorter if people would grasp that point.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.