Not at all.
A: "The sky is green."
B: "No, actually it's blue."
A: "Uh-uh...green."
B: "I've seen it. It's blue."
A: "We'll, I think it will be green. That's the plan."
B: "Ugh. Never mind."
No intimidation. It's just trying to help.
But the sky isn't blue at all.
The sky is every colour of the rainbow. Owing to human physiology and atmospheric conditions, sunlight penetrating the atmosphere appears blue. But the sky itself is many colours. It also appears as many colours to the human eye too. The effect is best observed at dusk, when the sky appears red, orange, purple.
As for green...if a little pixie says that the sky is green, don't intimidate him into silence, but listen closely to him - for green is the colour the sky assumes before a thunderstorm, possibly a tornado. Run!
See? One would've bullied a person into either conformity, or silence, or else expulsion. When dissenting opinion is what teaches us that the sky isn't blue, that the sun doesn't revolve around the earth, that humans are evolved from apes. Progress is not achieved by angry mobs beating simple truths that every expert knows to be correct into dissenting people's heads.
The aim of a forum is not for everybody to come out a drone with one single opinion. That's totalitarianism. The object of free debate is to let many opinions thrive, to let every voice and idea be expressed in safety.
I do not fear intrusive surveillance technology. No, the thing I fear is mob mentality and majorities trying to silence minority opinion ("...but, he's wrong"). Are Catholics wrong? Presbyterians? Jews? Surely they can't all be correct. Must the incorrect ones be silenced and ostracised?
In a bitter irony, I do not fear the NextGen technology. I fear the people in this thread, who silenced another poster because 'he was wrong', and because his questioning authorities is akin to 'stirring the pot, being a troublemaker'. And they don't even see anything wrong with that. That mentality, and not any intrusive tech, is the enemy of the open society.
Lastly, I am talking to you, but not about you. The culprits ought to take you as the example of how to be of different opinion in a respectful manner.