Longhairbear
Well-Known Member
My take on this is that the execs will wring the parks dry, and then let them die.
I do think the team concept of a creative CEO with a financially oriented President (assuming you get the right match) has been shown to work well over the long term. However, these days it is hard to find enough people at that level who have egos that can work as a team. It is rare to find the creative CEO with a great financial discipline these days. I'd rather have my CFO more of a guy who says what is and isn't financially viable but that model seems to be dying off. Seems like CFO's are a lot more active these days.
But now they have gotten greedy (just like our pal Mickey) and some of their shows have been dreadful. How they could have screwed up a show about Elvis in Las Vegas is just astounding, but they did (I actually fell asleep during it!)
There have only been a few that have been worth face value. But that was when the face value was sane. I've had Super Bowl tickets but I purchased them at face value and sold them for four times face. Super Bowl is a game best watched on TV. However, sneaking into some of the parties during Super Bowl week in a Super Bowl city is where the fun is. It is amazing what you can get away with if you act like you belong there.
You can also have two creatives. By no means would I term Frank Wells a 'money man' even if he sorta winds up in that role a la Walt and Roy.
Companies that I feel will exist in the long term aren't the ones who only focus on the bottom line in the short term.
(49ers tomorrow!)
Who are some of the very, very, very , very, very few financial guys/gals out their who grasp creativity beyond a spreadsheet Mr.Spirit? Interested in knowing which ones are if you can think of any.
I had my connections to a couple in Tampa and the one in Jacksonville. I did not bother with going to the games. I prefer going to games with fans and not corporate sponsors and their guests. I got into a couple of corporate parties and an NFLPA party. Although my my big win was getting into one of the Playboy parties. I kind of retired from sneaking into parties after that. Leave at the top of the game.That is definitely true. I didn't sneak into any SB parties (although I have snuck into other parties!), but the parties in Miami in 2007 and 2010 were much more enjoyable than the games -- especially '07 in which I didn't go, but went to the Craig Ferguson Late, Late Show tapings on SoBe instead.
When I first went to the games in the 90s, I thought they were crazy. And they only got worse. The crowds. The sponsors. The jocksniffers. ... and then post 9/11 security.
Oh shoot. That bad? I was thinking of checking it out on my next Las Vegas trip. Have not really gone any shows on my last few trips. They seem to have lost their punch and are way overpriced now. I kind of miss the cheap rooms, cheap shows and cheap eats while I lose my money in the casino. Now it costs so much that I don't have enough money to gamble with so I don't go as often.
Non-Sequitor or future Disney Park owners?
I was talking BOS and Disney back in 2011!
http://miceage.micechat.com/kevinyee/ky082311a.htm
My position then was that Disney wasn't being blue ENOUGH and had stayed 'red'... trying to compete toe to toe with Uni and 'reacting' rather than leading.
You don't have to worry. Viva Elvis was replaced by another show (Zarkana maybe?) last year. Vegas can still be quite cheap, but you have to know where to stay and when to go. I'm getting offers all the time and while I gamble some, I am by no means a whale. ... Just a warning, though, that some point around 2008 the MGM Resorts adopted a resort fee at all their properties (most around $16-20 a night), while Ceasar's resorts have none.
My faves are still The Hotel at Mandalay Bay (about to become The Delano) and the Venetian.
You don't have to worry. Viva Elvis was replaced by another show (Zarkana maybe?) last year. Vegas can still be quite cheap, but you have to know where to stay and when to go. I'm getting offers all the time and while I gamble some, I am by no means a whale. ... Just a warning, though, that some point around 2008 the MGM Resorts adopted a resort fee at all their properties (most around $16-20 a night), while Ceasar's resorts have none.
My faves are still The Hotel at Mandalay Bay (about to become The Delano) and the Venetian.
You and Spirit must have gone to different high schools together.I think in the end Spirit and I are saying the same thing, though oddly we are using the same metaphor in opposite directions to say that same thing.
A bit of both I suppose. Could you image what kind of resort WDW could be with 10-20 billion dollars?Non-Sequitor or future Disney Park owners?
Just read the wikipedia article. Nintendo is an atrocious example. Yeah the Wii was a success, but look at the Wii U. Nintendo will be a subsidiary of Microsoft in less than 5 years.
Well, do you have any intention of buying a Wii U? Being a console maker is a VERY expensive business. If Nintendo loses the faith of Third Party devs and sales tank in North America and Europe they will be in a very bad position. Nintendo can't afford to lose money on this console and a posible acquisition of its development studios and IP is a very real possibility.keep dreaming
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.