Lee said:My bad.
I was typing in a hurry and put "beta" like an idiot. :hammer:
I second second! Gut that beast and build a new coaster. And for any imaginers reading this I have just 2 words for you on the next space mountain.....LAUNCH IT!Lynx04 said:I second!!!!!!
I am all for a complete gutting and new track and experience put in. The ride is out dated and so much more could be done with todays tech to make the ride so much more enjoyable.
Master Yoda said:I second second! Gut that beast and build a new coaster.
trdisneyfan said:As for potentially launching the new SM with a LIM, I've heard it can't work because of overheating issues.
trdisneyfan said:As for potentially launching the new SM with a LIM, I've heard it can't work because of overheating issues. The sheer volume of cars that would have to be launched per hour would burn out the LIM - which is why you really only see launch-style coasters with longer (i.e. fewer) trains. But I'm sure the imagineers are doing whatever possible to overcome this, because it would make the most sense thematically.
But if you have premier do it, there wouldn't be as many trains but there would be more seats per train, instead of 6 seats per train there could be 16 or up to 32 depending on how many cars they want to add.trdisneyfan said:Before you go hoping for a DL-sytle update of SM, let's see how it turns out. Just remember the lesson learned from the Rocket Rods.
If the WDW version is updated to the extent DL's is, be prepared for the ride to be closed for 2 years. They can't exactly get a crane in an enclosed building, so the construction is very, VERY slow. Maybe WDW's version would allow them to remove some or all of the roof to make the construction go faster, but a lot of comments have been made regarding the DL update that the original Space Mountain could have been built several times over within the timeframe of this update, which is not even scheduled to be complete until a year from now.
As for potentially launching the new SM with a LIM, I've heard it can't work because of overheating issues. The sheer volume of cars that would have to be launched per hour would burn out the LIM - which is why you really only see launch-style coasters with longer (i.e. fewer) trains. But I'm sure the imagineers are doing whatever possible to overcome this, because it would make the most sense thematically.
Why mess with the track?
Doesnt everyone boast that Disneyland's Pirates of the Carribbean is sooo much better than WDW and DL's the original.
Can't we have an original attraction that shouldn't have to be matched to its three "lesser" cousins?
I know this is a bit off topic but WDW's POTC is the biggest let down of all the disney attractions that were cloned. Everytime I ride it I come off shaking my head and thinking, "why". I don't think the could have dumb down POTC any more even if they tried, well they could have made us walk through it.Lee said:Bad comparison. DL's is twice as long, in a better setting, and has a real story, as opposed to the Cliff Notes version WDW got. Nothing to do with which came first.
Lee said:Because its old, rough, and Disney can do better.
That's reason enough right there.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.