doctornick
Well-Known Member
Partially it’s that people just complain a lot more since 2016.
World should have focused more on iconic landscapes and less on buildings. Iguazu Falls is breathtaking. Even if it is so powerful that it makes the camera fall out of focus for a split second…
Yeah, I think it ultimately comes down to making artistic choices that best fit the medium. Working in landscapes that would look better on the screen makes more sense than "iconic" structures that would be distorted or fake appearing. Even so, sticking to man made things....
If the Eiffel Tower was obviously going to look bent, maybe just don't use that. I mean, they could have done something like (say) the Parthenon or Colosseum if they wanted an additional cultural thing from Europe.
Same goes for the Taj Mahal. If you have to do a complete CGI, it's probably not worth doing that structure. Maybe something like Angkor Wat would have been a good alternative. (I do love the Rose smell though.)