Patience doesn't come into it.Yes, they're very aware of that. Which is why, in conjunction with a new theatre, and new movie, the quality will be upgraded. Patience, my young padawan!
Your argument is valid, but lacks perspective. We're just saying the film has been neglected too long and run into the ground unnecessarily. They do that with tons of attractions. Maintenance is a thing of the past. Now, they wait until they do an annual refurb (Splash Mountain), entirely change the ride, or just close it completely.Let's say they do what you suggest you do. The reaction on this forum, looking for anything to pin Iger and Disney would would be, "WTH! Typical Iger and Disney. Close down a very popular ride when they're going to put in a new film anyway. There are very few rides in FW to begin with, two of which aren't worth riding (Energy and Imagination) and they're going to close Soarin??!!! Why do back to back refurbs when it can be done at the same time!"
To me it makes no sense. I'd do it all at the same time. The new filming is confirmed. The new theatre is all but confirmed. You can do it in phases, keeping two theatres open at all times until entirely complete. Build Theatre 3 with all new technology then open it. Close Theatre 1 and keep Theatre 2 open. Refurb Theatre 1 with all new technology. Open it, then close Theatre 2. When Theatre 2 is refurbed, open it. When all three are open, introduce the new film.
But nope can't do that. Using your logic, the entire thing has to be closed down NOW. Refurb the existing film. Reopen it. Then close it down again (maybe in the phases as above). It's insanity more than is necessary.
Exactly! The standard is lower now and it really isn't even close.I've said it before.
Horizons has three Omnimax projectors. Two purchased outright for each screen and a third dry hired, kept ready just incase it was required to replace one of the other two.
That's how standards used to be.
I cannot like this enough. TOTALLY agree. Most of this could be fixed after hours and MAYBE a day closure. It's a film...you can order or get the supplies you need and it's a matter of installing it. Require a new project? BUY IT!!Except changing out the film stock and projector wouldnt require a closure and could likely be done overnight.
Don't make excuses because they irresponsibly ran it far beyond its lifespan. You wouldn't accept a movie theater with this quality, why should it be okay for a major attraction and a premium priced theme park? It also don't help that the quality of he image is about 80% of the Soarin' experience.
Also this forum is always in favor of refurbishments if it means repairs and improvements.
Let's say they do what you suggest you do. The reaction on this forum, looking for anything to pin Iger and Disney would would be, "WTH! Typical Iger and Disney. Close down a very popular ride when they're going to put in a new film anyway.
Yes, but the image quality has been bad for a while and should have been addressed already. Using "well there are plans to upgrade it at some point in the future!" Isn't an excuse. It's not fair to people who are paying these premium prices to experience it today.
Your argument is valid, but lacks perspective. We're just saying the film has been neglected too long and run into the ground unnecessarily. They do that with tons of attractions. Maintenance is a thing of the past. Now, they wait until they do an annual refurb (Splash Mountain), entirely change the ride, or just close it completely.
We're just asking for some middle ground. Of course it doesn't make sense to shut down an attraction to fix it when the new one is about to be released. This should and could have been done 5 years ago. It's been slowly degrading year after year after year.
They could have easily refurbed the film in phases you mentioned too. You know why they didn't? It works. Good enough.
It is not the responsibility of the CEO to manage how much dust is on the Soarin' film, or how many ceiling tiles are missing from small world, or how many light bulbs are out on the boat in Splash Mountain. He relies on the trust of his management team to keep the day to day operations of the levels below him successful.
Iger is aware of issues with Soarin' and has appropriated funds to address it, both in refreshing the attraction with a new updated film, and increasing capacity. What else do you think he should do?
Replace Iger with me as CEO and I'll get the parks fixed.Okay. Point made. Which amounts to coulda, woulda, shoulda. You're upset they haven't refurbed it before now but agree it could all be done with the release of the new film. So, what do you want them to do, then?
I beg to differ with you! My wife is an administrator of a hospital. She walks the place daily and looks for these type things and calls out the responsible parties! She has a staff of 586 people and like she tells me, how can she expect them to care if they see that she doesn't!
A CEO can basically "do" no work. He has to be a good delegator and establish the culture. It is possible in business to demand that from the top down.Igers scope is larger than just the theme parks he is responsible for. He cannot have a foot on the ground at all times. It is just not possible.
In my opinion, the enemy lies within the Board of Directors.
(Sheryl Sandberg, Jack Dorsey...)
Sometimes the bigger guy and the 'customer is always right..' wins out. Think about how big of a customer Disney is to IMAX in terms of # of IMAX systems disney has bought...
Yep. If this were an isolated incident, that would be one thing, and while on an optimistic note I would say maintenance at WDW is starting to turn around, but you still see this far too often at WDW. Not to turn this into another WDW vs. Universal debate, but a huge difference at UOR as of the last few years is that even their oldest, non-major draw attractions still generally look and sound very good. Meanwhile, WDW operates some of its biggest draw attractions with mediocre or shoddy show quality.Exactly! The standard is lower now and it really isn't even close.
The same exact thing is happening to Carousel of Progress right as we speak. They have it "working" but at the expense of show quality. Awful theater carpet, seats worn out, audio issues, plastic shiny animatronics, and an overall shoddy presentation of classic Walt attraction. Say what you want about the attraction. I love it, some don't. However,as Cogsworth from Beauty and the Beast would say, "If you're going to do it, let's do it." And do it right.
They are either letting it completely run into the ground or they'll close it. I doubt there is any other path at this point. With more popular E-Ticket rides, they just wait until the next major refurb to do any major maintenance or upgrades.
It is the new normal and it can be seen all over WDW.
Can anyone answer as to why grid lines would phase in and out on the screen like on my last ride?
Why would Disney spend ANY money fixing stuff if people keep flinging money at them for crap.I've always liked Soarin', but have always felt that it's a bit overrated. the current image quality is beyond embarrassing. Every time I go on it, I tell myself "there's no way the quality of the image is as bad as I remember." But it's usually worse! I always find it amazing that one of the most visited theme parks in the world doesn't want to keep up to date or repair faulty equipment. It's cringeworthy sometimes.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.