CTXRover
Well-Known Member
I just wanted to make one more comment to the above. The reasoning of using the same film as CA serves many purposes. 1) It is easier and cheaper. It also insures a hit. Many times when they clone attraction concepts and change them, there are always those who think the original would have been better (i.e. Dinosaur's ride vehicle and experience was originally inspired by the Indy ride at DL). 2) It allows Soarin' to have a closer tie to the 50th celebration and DL itself while also providing great views of different landscapes fitting the attraction in with the Land. 3) It has the potential to allow them to reintroduce a brand "new" Soarin' for Epcot's 25th, providing another reason to visit Epcot during its 25th while providing another great experience to Epcot NOW.
I do believe the CA film will be received very well as part of a new Land pavilion experience. But that doesn't necessarily mean I don't recognize a different potential with a new film. That is why I too hope and look forward to a new film that covers even more than just CA's beauty sometime in the future. I think there are two different things here. One in which it is believed that a new film would be nice (to which I agree) and the other that the CA film doesn't belong at all (to which I disagree).
I do believe the CA film will be received very well as part of a new Land pavilion experience. But that doesn't necessarily mean I don't recognize a different potential with a new film. That is why I too hope and look forward to a new film that covers even more than just CA's beauty sometime in the future. I think there are two different things here. One in which it is believed that a new film would be nice (to which I agree) and the other that the CA film doesn't belong at all (to which I disagree).