raven
Well-Known Member
Why can't Disney pay for their own upkeep? Never understood this with Epcot. They certainly charge guests enough already.Well that's a blow. I was told they'd renewed.
Be afraid.
Why can't Disney pay for their own upkeep? Never understood this with Epcot. They certainly charge guests enough already.Well that's a blow. I was told they'd renewed.
Be afraid.
Well that's a blow. I was told they'd renewed.
Be afraid. Or it could work in the classics favour.
Why can't Disney pay for their own upkeep? Never understood this with Epcot. They certainly charge guests enough already.
Well that's a blow. I was told they'd renewed.
Be afraid.
Exactly. I can't stand them acting like they're unable to afford upkeep if there's no sponsor. The days of sponors are mostly long over with. It's just an excuse because they're too cheap in this case to do anything
With this news, I fear the days of Epcot's last remaining Omnimover dark ride are numbered. We may soon need to thank the Phoenicians for helping us to celebrate advances in human communication for the past 35 years.
Appropriate?
Well that's a blow. I was told they'd renewed.
Be afraid.
The only thing that is keeping me from going nuts is the omnimover track is integrated into the structure of SSE. Had it not been, it would have already been transformed into a roller coaster.With this news, I fear the days of Epcot's last remaining Omnimover dark ride are numbered. We may soon need to thank the Phoenicians for helping us to celebrate advances in human communication for the past 35 years.
If we wish to discover the wonders of Epcot, it seems as though Living with the Land will be our last outpost.
Well that's a blow. I was told they'd renewed.
Be afraid.
I don't think Disney will close it. The big problem is they don't have a very good track record with maintaining sponsorless attractions. They also tend to give a new sponsor quite a bit of creative control with the attraction they sponsor.Could somebody explain to me the thinking that no sponsor = end of SSE? I understand that the attraction has never operated without a sponsor, but why does that necessarily have to mean its closure? Is Disney 100% dedicated on not up-keeping it under its own dime?
I understand that the attraction has never operated without a sponsor, but why does that necessarily have to mean its closure?
Right, I mean specifically SSE has never operated without a sponsor, unless I'm forgetting something.Many pavilions have been running Sponserless for sometime....
Energy Sponsorless since 2004
Mission Space since 2016
Imagination since 2010
Living Seas since 2001
why does that necessarily have to mean its closure? Is Disney 100% dedicated on not up-keeping it under its own dime?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.