HMF
Well-Known Member
Judi Dench is not the problem. What they have her saying is.I actually don't mind Judy Dench...The problem with the current version is that ending.
Judi Dench is not the problem. What they have her saying is.I actually don't mind Judy Dench...The problem with the current version is that ending.
Judi Dench is not the problem. What they have her saying is.
Quite literally the same issue with the M:S script. Had Lt. Dan, bad script. Got a new actor, used same bland/crap script.Judi Dench is not the problem. What they have her saying is.
The current script is intelligence-insultingly bad.
Listen to it in German. It becomes a whole new story. And by new story, I mean I couldn't understand any part of it but it was more entertaining.The current script is intelligence-insultingly bad.
Aha! The mysterious connection to Club 33, confirmed!
Aha! The mysterious connection to Club 33, confirmed!
I never realized those triangles on the descent were supposed to glow. They always just seemed like dusty parts of the ceiling that were trying to be hid through darkness.
I never realized those triangles on the descent were supposed to glow. They always just seemed like dusty parts of the ceiling that were trying to be hid through darkness.
I assume this is sarcasm, but historically, most Future World attractions have looked at the history of a particular category. It helps tell the story.Well, since it is the most iconic ride of Future World, then it should be clear that it's mostly about the past.
Sarcasm with a point. The majority of the edutainment ride is history, not the Future. And what it has for the Future is weak. People complain about what doesn't belong in Future World thematically, and this doesn't, but it gets a pass for some reason (hint: it's nostalgia). Yes, it's edutainment, but it ain't the Future.I assume this is sarcasm, but historically, most Future World attractions have looked at the history of a particular category. It helps tell the story.
If you're talking about Spaceship Earth as a whole, I couldn't disagree more. If you're talking strictly about the descent, I'm with you. Having said that, Horizons and World of Motion offered up some cartoon-y weird views of the future with some playful looks at history as well. The progression is necessary and certainly helps keep things fresh (and yes, that's deliberate - a focus on history keeps things fresh).Sarcasm with a point. The majority of the edutainment ride is history, not the Future. And what it has for the Future is weak. People complain about what doesn't belong in Future World thematically, and this doesn't, but it gets a pass for some reason (hint: it's nostalgia). Yes, it's edutainment, but it ain't the Future.
Sarcasm with a point. The majority of the edutainment ride is history, not the Future. And what it has for the Future is weak. People complain about what doesn't belong in Future World thematically, and this doesn't, but it gets a pass for some reason (hint: it's nostalgia). Yes, it's edutainment, but it ain't the Future.
The current script is intelligence-insultingly bad.
Of course, I'm also of the opinion that they should rename Future World to Discovery Expo and move Space Mountain, it's a small world and Carousel of Progress there.
If SE doesn't fit, then I cant wait to hear your thoughts on Figment...The problem is the name future world, when it really should be Aspiration World or Inspiration Land
Well then, it's always been misnamed. Innoventions tried to be about 'The Future', but continually became outdated.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.