flynnibus
Premium Member
Nobody is disputing initial cost...yes a bus system is cheaper to implement. But not cheaper to maintain. Most municipalities don't have billions to spend on a monorail, nor can they wait for a break even of 10-15 years when compared to buses. So Buses would be the only option not necessarily the most preferable.
Keep telling yourself that dream - reality is otherwise. And BTW.. municipalities fund with Bonds over decades. The reason they chose these types of systems is they are cheaper to OPERATE - which they don't fund with bonds, but with revenue. Which is the complete opposite of what you believe it to be.
Don't be fooled by 'frequent smaller costs being more expensive than bigger less frequent costs'. That doesn't always hold true. What we have going for us is the thousands of studies done in real world scenarios by municipalities around the world showing the operational effectiveness and cost effectiveness of buses for short haul, high flex scenarios. No one is putting in monorails... it's not some anti-Monorail conspiracy... or greedy execs worrying about next month's budget. It's harsh reality across the globe - private and public organizations.