RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
Frankly, I don't think Disney needs Avatar or Avatarland, they have a plethora of exciting and unique material at their fingertips.... They've barely touched upon some of the Pixar stuff... or utilized it well... Laugh floor isn't as good as it could be and while Buzz's Space Ranger Spin and TSM are decent attractions there is so much more to be explored.
Once they get their animation right again (the latest Winnie movie was great), they should have more to expand upon...
Toy Story could just as easily become a land in it's own right.... what an immersive area that would create.
Personally, I'm of the opinion that all future Pixar attractions should be put in DHS. I have no problem with a large portion of that park (Backlot Tour) being devoted to Pixar, but it doesn't make much sense to put it anywhere else.
My hunch on Avatar? Disney is trying to reel it back in after realizing it was an executive hunch that shouldn't have been played.
The Avatarland thing was the ultimate Black Ops project that came out of nowhere and none of the usual insiders knew anything about. It's been reported it was cooked up last summer on only the highest levels of executive leadership, primarily in Burbank. And they didn't even have any solid ride concepts, and the WDI Blue Sky process hadn't even begun. Then they announced it and the world went... huh?
Now that it's out there, they've probably done some customer research on the idea and the concept, as well as gotten a better grasp on what WDI could do artistically. And the results are less than stellar, especially from the customer research side.
And now they are having that moment where the executives go "Uh... guys? I think we kinda made a mistake here."
It wouldn't surprise me one bit to learn they are trying to reel Avatarland back in, or at least dramatically downscale expectations for it as a megabudget Cars Land type addition. Perhaps just do a stage show or something and try and find something better for WDW's version of a Cars Land-style megabudget addition?
There are two different schools of thought here. It sounds like you have some executives that seem to believe that no mistakes were made with regards to Pleasure Island. Then you have executives that realized the original Fantasyland concepts didn't have the mass appeal needed for an expansion of this size/price.
The good thing is, Tom Staggs seems to be at the heart of the Avatar project and he also seemed to be spearheading the changes in Fantasyland as well. I've said in the past that I think best case scenario of an Avatar land in the park is that the land itself is used as a mystical environment but the land can and will include attractions that aren't linked to Avatar. It will be a mythical animals land with Avatar as the foundation, but say for example that John Carter is a surprise hit - that could get an attraction, or perhaps an original concept not tied to an existing franchise could also be the basis.