Typically self-indulgent Hill nonsense.
What was self-indulgent about it? Don't you like hearing about the club? Isn't it great that people are still talking about it? It seems like a lot of folks are really negative on Jim Hill. This post is mostly a bunch of photos including a rare backstage one. Here is a repost of my reply to everyone else's replies to my original post on the Yahoo group:
I found absolutely nothing vainglorious about the article and as for pedantic, hearing or reading as much detail as possible about the club makes my brain happy. As for mentioning that this event took place after Congaloosh, this is just a fact and there is no harm in stating facts. Wouldn't it be nice if more so-called news sources just put the facts out there and let you digest them what ever way you want?
Frankly, I think its great that anyone at all is still writing articles about
this great attraction well over a year after it closed. I honestly don't
understand the hostility toward the article, did this author kill a whole bunch of kittens or something?
And I loved the backstage photo. It was small and hard to make out but its more of the backstage than anyone posted anywhere on the internet before.
If this author wrote another article in the same tone about the Adventurers Club, I would read it and I would probably enjoy it. If he wrote a hundred articles about the Adventurers Club, I would read them and be happy. At this point anything to do with the club gets me excited. Maybe its just because Congaloosh is out of my price range, but I'll take what I can get.