AdventureHasAName
Well-Known Member
If you think AK is a 1/4 day park, what do you think HS is?
Four rides and a stunt show.
If you think AK is a 1/4 day park, what do you think HS is?
I’d call it a super-stretch.
Sorry.
Anyway, the plywood flats (and obviously-not-a-limo vehicle, obviously-coaster-track “roadway,” etc.) make it not very immersive. So, anything that can turn it into a more immersive experience (e.g., you don’t have to suspend your disbelief as much regarding the visuals) would be an improvement, as long as it doesn’t ruin the aesthetics or sightlines Sunset Boulevard / the Tower of Terror area. But it would be REALLY unfortunate if the retheme involved messing up that area, as it’s one of WDW’s best immersive environments (IMO).
That solves a lot then.Four rides and a stunt show.
It's no secret there are a few shining inspiration and cues. You may already know about the sounds that ay/used to a
play to the queue as drop shafts open.
Finding Nemo, Ratatouille, Three Caballeros, Guardians of the Galaxy1. What IP have they stuffed into epcot? Only Frozen. Everything else is still in planning stages. So how can you say you’re not going to judge SWL but you’ll rip on Epcot additions/changes.
2. AK has never been a 1/4 day park for anyone except people only interested in rides. The theming and level of detail are amazing. The shows are good.
I don’t see how you can have both of the opinions above unless you’re just ****y about everything Disney does. Because people who love the depth and edutainment of WS should love AK.
I'd still ride an Elvis ride.
Disney doesn't have to have the latest, or most trendy, or fashionable.
Elvis and the Beatles both stand the test of time.
Quite a bit more than Aerosmith indeed, much as I love RnRC as is.Elvis and the Beatles both stand the test of time.
Quite a bit more than Aerosmith indeed, much as I love RnRC as is.
At any rate, the order is to add Disney properties to all experiences, so all our speculation and wish listing is void. The choice is more between Incredibles or Marvel.
No for both.Is the Jonas Brothers or Miley Cyrus taking over the ride instead still a option?
.........Asking for a friend.
The Beatles make the most sense to me.
Make it a yellow submarine coaster and the visuals that would needed to be added take care of themselves without much thought
OR
make it a yellow submarine VR coaster and then Disney doesn't even have to spend money on re-building the actual ride itself.
Is there even any reason to re-theme Tower Of Terror? It is one of the most immersive and beautifully designed attractions at WDW... it is a truly complete experience...setting up as you walk down Sunset.. the gates and grounds and even the exit, all beautifully done....
Agreed they are the perfect choice. However, the issue is they'd have to get permission from Apple Corps (the Beatles-owned music company, not the computer company), as they control all the Beatles-related partnerships. The question then becomes what sort of creative approval they would want and do the surviving stakeholders really want the Beatles to be a follow-up to Aerosmith on a 20 year old ride. Sort of lowers their cachet a bit. The partnership with Cirque required a brand-new hundred million dollar show.
I have a friend who worked on Hard Rock Park, the short lived (and greatly missed) theme park in SC.
They tried really hard to get a Beatles attraction but apparently Apple was holding out hope for an entire Beatles theme park.
Apple plays hardball but I understand because they're trying to protect their property!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.