EricsBiscuit
Well-Known Member
When you go to WDW do you go to CBR and stay at the MARTINique part? HahaMaelstrom was considered one in 1988.
When you go to WDW do you go to CBR and stay at the MARTINique part? HahaMaelstrom was considered one in 1988.
Haha!When you go to WDW do you go to CBR and stay at the MARTINique part? Haha
The quality of the sets, the length, etc. make it seem like at most, it’s a D-ticket.Maelstrom was considered one in 1988.
The quality of the sets, the length, etc. make it seem like at most, it’s a D-ticket.
This? Kitchen Calamity.@marni1971 is this a whole expansion or just the ride
so just KC?This? Kitchen Calamity.
As it stands yes. Were you expecting more?so just KC?
yeah kinda, mainly cause the area around it looks nothing like France currently is a huge make over of the courtyard area happening? also, why does the entrance look likes it's where the current bakery is if this makeover is the case?As it stands yes. Were you expecting more?
That is not true. EPCOT Center was plenty popular at opening. The story that EPCOT Center was a boondoggle that needed the Studio is a myth perpetuated by Roy E. Disney and Michael Eisner to justify the takeover of the company and the shift in focus away from the highly profitable parks.As far as IP, for those too young to remember, EPCOT was devoid of characters in the beginning, and people did not like it.
Ummmm....yeah kinda, mainly cause the area around it looks nothing like France currently is a huge make over of the courtyard area happening? also, why does the entrance look likes it's where the current bakery is if this makeover is the case?
Well, EPCOT Center was missing the familiar characters until early 1984. But it certainly was popular. Year on year it saw a rise in attendance from 1982. It's first 3 months were so popular they had to extend the parking lot in early 1983.That is not true. EPCOT Center was plenty popular at opening. The story that EPCOT Center was a boondoggle that needed the Studio is a myth perpetuated by Roy E. Disney and Michael Eisner to justify the takeover of the company and the shift in focus away from the highly profitable parks.
yeah kinda, mainly cause the area around it looks nothing like France currently is a huge make over of the courtyard area happening? also, why does the entrance look likes it's where the current bakery is if this makeover is the case?
yeah kinda, mainly cause the area around it looks nothing like France currently is a huge make over of the courtyard area happening? also, why does the entrance look likes it's where the current bakery is if this makeover is the case?
What about Jamaica, Bermuda, Bahama, Key Largo, or Montego?Haha!
I was quite partial to Aruba back in the day.
If Disney labels it something I think I'd go with that since they're the one likely to know all the criteria. As such, we already know GotG will be an E Ticket.It's all subjective. What you may consider to be one letter, someone else may consider to be another. Yes, maybe Disney labels it a certain letter internally, but that's no less subjective. Nobody is right or wrong. And since people use the term differently, they're not even arguing on the same plane.
Thankfully I haven't seen a ticket argument for a while, so maybe people are realizing this?
I'm not gonna pretend I was alive in 1988, but I have a hard time believing that. It's not like Maelstrom was the gold standard for dark rides until more impressive things came along. Pirates and IASW are what I'd consider E-ticket boat rides, and they were built in the 60s! It was too short to be an E then, just like FEA and 7DMT are today.Maelstrom was considered one in 1988.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.