I propose the following tweak to improve Harm:
I’d watch that show!
I would pay for a Genie+ or ILL to watch Harm receive that
Ok how about some time in a dunking booth in world showcasePerhaps you are joking and I’m missing it…
But I can assure you I do not work for Disney… unless you think this west coast 30 year old Canadian somehow got hiredI joined this forum in 2005 when I was 16. Some people
on here know me quite well and can vouch that I am no PR shill.
I simply think it’s absurd to assert that Steve should have quit rather then take the challenge handed to him with this show.
I also don’t think Harmonious is a bad show… I actually thing it’s quite great. But I have publicly shared there are tweaks that could be made to help it be a bit more solid for more people.
best post of the day.
sadly true and its ruining the parks and way too politically charged.Ok how about some time in a dunking booth in world showcaseI think they guy was maybe given a case of too many people wanting to use this tech for a water show and did the best with the directives he was given. Its such a mishmash that I cant believe the blame lays solely on one person. Someone above his paygrade had to approve it, and if anyone should be in hot water it should be the one who approved it or pushed it in its current direction. Disney was a Creative Giant at one time, but now its creativity by committee most of the time, the way I see it from the outside looking in.
Then the problem is still Chapek and Iger who instituted the franchise mandate under which he had to operate. A good leader is open to the idea that their ideas aren’t the best. I’ve told bosses why something was a bad idea and explained my point and presented something better. Youre just defending a toxic environment where people are expected to be Yes Men and not actually creative.Okay so Steve, who is in a relatively high position in the company, with a long storied career, should just… say no to a project he is assigned… and essentially quit? Just because you don’t like the show?
I’ll try that at my work this week and let you know how that goes.
Do you hear yourself….
I absolutely think the problem is them. If Chapek isn't the type that's aware of his own strengths and weaknesses, just approaching him about a flawed idea might be dangerously tricky.Then the problem is still Chapek and Iger who instituted the franchise mandate under which he had to operate. A good leader is open to the idea that their ideas aren’t the best. I’ve told bosses why something was a bad idea and explained my point and presented something better. Youre just defending a toxic environment where people are expected to be Yes Men and not actually creative.
I think this is being missed somewhat here. Sure, the idea isn't great but it was also badly executed. I don't think Steve Davison can completely wash his hands of that as it was a thankless but not impossible assignment with lots of bad choices. Unless, of course, we find out there was more meddling than just an idea from on high.I don't think it is really surprising that the idea came from the top. We've seen this many times in the past. Whenever there is a large spend, it really has to have support from that level. You may not like the idea, but was it executed as well as it could have been?
This is very curious to watch. There certainly seems some momentum gathering in the past few weeks. The real turning point seems to have been the flop that was the launch of the 50th celebration.Chapek vs the world.
![]()
Company (and teams) culture can change as they evolve…Those with integrity can and do that all the time. Artists decline projects all the time if there not going to fit that artists style or if it might damage there brand. I'm sure he is well off and well known, that a multitude of other projects would present themselves.
I'd go so far as to say, plan your life, so you don't have to work for a company you don't agree with.
But most folks would just throw there hands up and say, come on man... I got bills!
I didn't see any defense of toxic work culture in the quoted post, though perhaps I'm missing something from earlier in the thread. It's possible (or perhaps probable, given some insider perspectives) that there is a toxic culture, but there's no indication that Davison wasn't allowed to have lively conversations with leadership about what type of show would be best or that he even disagreed with Chapek in the first place.Then the problem is still Chapek and Iger who instituted the franchise mandate under which he had to operate. A good leader is open to the idea that their ideas aren’t the best. I’ve told bosses why something was a bad idea and explained my point and presented something better. Youre just defending a toxic environment where people are expected to be Yes Men and not actually creative.
Yes clearly.By context, I assume you meant to say "forgettable"?
It’s even worse. Superstar Limo was awful and stupid. Harm is bland. Like I say over and over, stupid is always better then bland.Chapek is having his Eisner moment. The only difference is that Eisner had his 20 years into his tenure after lots of big accomplishments.![]()
Are there any Disney Christmas songs?I assume there’s 0% chance we see a holiday tag?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.