News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

GoofGoof

Premium Member
The cancelling of this project is also in the financial interest of DIS.

As there is a glut of commercial real estate currently with an expected crash in the valuation of commercial real estate, the anticipated value in respect to NPV of the project makes the project unjustifiable.

Could be DeSantis, fiscal prudence, or a bit of both.
Doesn’t Disney own the land already? So if real estate value is dropping isn’t it worth less now if they dump it back on market? Not moving the jobs saves them some relocation costs and obviously the cost of constructing the building but they also lose the tax credits. Short term it’s a financial gain to cancel but long term it’s harder to say.
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
The problem there will be the housing shortage. California has something like 2.5 well paid jobs for every house that's actually available to purchase.
I saw a program in that the housing is so expensive and shortages that thousands in CA sleep in their cars in a number of neighborhoods and parking lots.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
I just say get the URL from the site instead of apple's lame share. I can't even click the link in my desktop browser without it going to try to install apps. It's not that I hate apple... I hate sites that try to funnel you through their apps instead of the web. Like apple news and podcasts :)

Okay but my entire point was the positioning of the news article as the lead on Apple’s news feed. I get what you’re saying though.
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
Doesn’t Disney own the land already? So if real estate value is dropping isn’t it worth less now if they dump it back on market? Not moving the jobs saves them some relocation costs and obviously the cost of constructing the building but they also lose the tax credits. Short term it’s a financial gain to cancel but long term it’s harder to say.
Class A space is dropping but land will be fine. They will make at least 10% on the purchase
 

Nubs70

Well-Known Member
Doesn’t Disney own the land already? So if real estate value is dropping isn’t it worth less now if they dump it back on market? Not moving the jobs saves them some relocation costs and obviously the cost of constructing the building but they also lose the tax credits. Short term it’s a financial gain to cancel but long term it’s harder to say.
The issue is with the $1B investment. The NPV calculation may well show that the $1B placed into another asset will provide a greater or even a simple positive return. I.E. spending $1B on an office complex is a bad investment.
 

BuddyThomas

Well-Known Member
I didn't know everyone became a stock broker overnight. I've never seen so much conjecture about stock price and how it relates to Disney park expansions.
It's exactly the same as how everyone on here became an epidemiologist overnight during COVID. That was all kinds of fun. And that's when the politics board was open. So extra extra fun. :p
 

Bleed0range

Well-Known Member
Just for anecdotal discussion (while I personally feel the stock price is unrelated to Park expansion), July 14, 2017, Disney's stock price closed at $104, the day later, they announced MMRR, Skyliner, Starcruiser, Space 220, and more.

2 Years later, Disney's stock closed at $130 before D23 2019, and they announced practically nothing.

Stock prices go up and down daily and seem too fluid to have too big of an effect on expansions that take a ton of money, time, investment. I would think they’re not that closely related. By the time anything were fully developed, engineered, built years would have gone by. The initial decision to expand in general is in an effort to make more money, be competitive and generate a higher stock price.
 

mikejs78

Premium Member
Republican mayor of Miami blasts DeSantis for allowing his "personal vendetta" to cost the state 2,000 jobs.

Regardless of whether or not this decision was made because of DeSantis, this isn't playing well for DeSantis.

 

ParentsOf4

Well-Known Member
Some are going to blame Desantis, but I suspect all of the above is rooted in bigger problems at Disney and he's just a symptom of those.
The Feud might have been the breaking point.

However, for a CEO who emphasizes the importance of creatives, forcing 2000 to move to FL was a bad look.

Perhaps more importantly, the company is looking to cut costs immediately. Sinking a billion into this did not make sense at this time.

All three played a factor. Which one was the most important depends on how you want to spin this.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom