kong1802
Well-Known Member
What I don't get is why from 1967 until DeSantis came into power did none of the other FL governors had an issue about Reedy Creek?
BecAUsE It WAs UNdEr thE RaDAr
What I don't get is why from 1967 until DeSantis came into power did none of the other FL governors had an issue about Reedy Creek?
You’re getting dangerously close to the realm of critical thinking.What I don't get is why from 1967 until DeSantis came into power did none of the other FL governors had an issue about Reedy Creek?
yes, according to this Duke operates the facility and sells the power to RCID through a power purchase agreement.Pretty sure Duke Energy runs it
You’re not alone. Neither did DeSantis.I live in Miami and visit Disney World multiple times a year and I had never even heard of Reedy Creek until last year.
If RCID didn't give Disney an advantage, why would Disney care about losing it?How was having a building code before one was required by the state an unfair advantage?
Oh for the love of Pete he didn't threaten to build a prison.Interesting to see that 'Disney' is the #2 trending topic on Twitter in the USA right now, and it's mainly people laughing at DeSantis for threatening to build a prison at Walt Disney World and talking about the general insanity of the whole situation.
If this is about Disney having an unfair advantage why aren't they unwinding the special district over time to allow outstanding debts to be paid off without adding any more? They could have done that without any issue.If RCID didn't give Disney an advantage, why would Disney care about losing it?
This isn't what's happening in Florida.This is nothing new. Insurance companies commonly drop folks for making claims.
I have Citizens because I'm on the gulf coast in St. Pete and they are doing mandatory inspections of every policy to try to find reasons to remove previous discounts and to drop coverage.This isn't what's happening in Florida.
Insurers are leaving the state altogether and dropping EVERY insured in the state. Citizens, the state run insurer of LAST RESORT is now the only option for a shockingly large number of residents.
The court will consider the context of the statute, which is to clarify that subsequent state and federal laws and regulations can override the development agreement. Now it’s not directly stated in the statute but it’s implied that those laws must have a legitimate public purpose. For example, let’s say a city entered into a development agreement which permitted a developer to construct a daycare facility next to a public dump. The state later passes a law banning daycare facilities from being built within a half mile of a dump. That is the purpose of the statute. It is essentially there to solidify the contracts clause test.It's awfully specific, though. What's your rationale behind why Disney would have the upper hand?
Why did he even float the possibility?Oh for the love of Pete he didn't threaten to build a prison.
Of course it gave Disney advantages. That’s why special districts are created.If RCID didn't give Disney an advantage, why would Disney care about losing it?
The two are unrelated.If freedom of speech was so important why do you care about losing it?
And most people outside of Miami have never heard of the town of Medley, that has more businesses than residents. Yet there you go.I live in Miami and visit Disney World multiple times a year and I had never even heard of Reedy Creek until last year.
Without RCID Disney would have had a more difficult time building WDW and may have selected a different site. It’s an “advantage” for Disney because of the size of the property they have. That doesn’t mean it’s an unfair advantage over competition. Why would Universal, Sea World or any other competition want anything with a similar size and scope as RCID? They would not. So it’s not really some competitive advantage as is being portrayed.If RCID didn't give Disney an advantage, why would Disney care about losing it?
I'm pleased to see a repeal of corporate welfare.
I'm not bothered that the reason for the repeal of the corporate welfare is a petty political squabble.
I guess you missed the press conference where he said they might consider building a state prison on the district’s land. His words not mine.Oh for the love of Pete he didn't threaten to build a prison.
I have Citizens because I'm on the gulf coast in St. Pete and they are doing mandatory inspections of every policy to try to find reasons to remove previous discounts and to drop coverage.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.