Chi84
Premium Member
Wait, what was the welfare?The two are unrelated.
I'm pleased to see a repeal of corporate welfare. I'm not bothered that the reason for the repeal of the corporate welfare is a petty political squabble.
Wait, what was the welfare?The two are unrelated.
I'm pleased to see a repeal of corporate welfare. I'm not bothered that the reason for the repeal of the corporate welfare is a petty political squabble.
Maybe not 'threaten', but he did mention it in his comments.Oh for the love of Pete he didn't threaten to build a prison.
It’s silly to call RCID corporate welfare. You are missing the whole point. The “advantage” has nothing to do with paying less taxes.The two are unrelated.
I'm pleased to see a repeal of corporate welfare. I'm not bothered that the reason for the repeal of the corporate welfare is a petty political squabble.
Didn't this say unfair advantage when you posted it?If RCID didn't give Disney an advantage, why would Disney care about losing it?
It helps the county taxpayers as well, so I'm not seeing the big problem here for the surrounding area.It’s silly to call RCID corporate welfare. You are missing the whole point. The “advantage” has nothing to do with paying less taxes.
What corporate welfare? Do you still at this stage in the discussion not understand how the district operated?The two are unrelated.
I'm pleased to see a repeal of corporate welfare. I'm not bothered that the reason for the repeal of the corporate welfare is a petty political squabble.
I'm not sure if you watched it live, or read the reporting on it after the fact. I watched the whole thing live, and it was extremely clear that he was joking.I guess you missed the press conference where he said they might consider building a state prison on the district’s land. His words not mine.
Always the defense when a politician floats something ridiculous. Oh they were joking! Fast forward to them actually doing it.I'm not sure if you watched it live, or read the reporting on it after the fact. I watched the whole thing live, and it was extremely clear that he was joking.
You would think we'd be familiar with this pattern by now.
It was bait. A troll. It wasn't a bona fide policy proposal. You can still say "baiting and trolling are bad" without resorting to the hyperbole that he literally wants to build a prison at Walt Disney World.
- Say something that's mildly controversial and probably inappropriate while maintaining plausible deniability.
- Watch the media completely overreact.
- Fundraise and campaign on #2 to great success because #2 is so disproportionate that it pushes #1 out of the news cycle.
Thank you. I’ve found this act now. That section doesn’t seem to apply to development agreements nor does it override other statutes requiring disclosure, and was signed into law after the RCID Developer Agreement was noticed and entered intoFLSenate.gov says the FL Senate version was identical and was signed by the governor.
I think many would agree with you if Ron hadn't shown that he was willing to follow through with these types of things multiple times (not just within the RCID saga).I'm not sure if you watched it live, or read the reporting on it after the fact. I watched the whole thing live, and it was extremely clear that he was joking.
You would think we'd be familiar with this pattern by now.
It was bait. A troll. It wasn't a bona fide policy proposal. You can still say "baiting and trolling are bad" without resorting to the hyperbole that he literally wants to build a prison at Walt Disney World.
- Say something that's mildly controversial and probably inappropriate while maintaining plausible deniability.
- Watch the media completely overreact.
- Fundraise and campaign on #2 to great success because #2 is so disproportionate that it pushes #1 out of the news cycle.
i watched the first half. Tuned out when he started talking about human trafficking. Honestly, the whole thing was pretty unbelievable. You rarely see a politician so triggered and unhinged in public like that. He came across as a toddler throwing a tantrum. It’s hard to say what if any of the stuff he said was actually serious since it was so over the top and factually inaccurate.I'm not sure if you watched it live, or read the reporting on it after the fact. I watched the whole thing live, and it was extremely clear that he was joking.
You would think we'd be familiar with this pattern by now.
It was bait. A troll. It wasn't a bona fide policy proposal. You can still say "baiting and trolling are bad" without resorting to the hyperbole that he literally wants to build a prison at Walt Disney World.
- Say something that's mildly controversial and probably inappropriate while maintaining plausible deniability.
- Watch the media completely overreact.
- Fundraise and campaign on #2 to great success because #2 is so disproportionate that it pushes #1 out of the news cycle.
Benefits don't have to take the form of cash to be "welfare." Eliminating red tape for one entity over another is still corporate welfare.What corporate welfare? Do you still at this stage in the discussion not understand how the district operated?
Could be, that's yet to be litigated. If they can establish that this legislation was retaliatory in nature, it very well might be struck down.You don’t care that the reason this is all happening is violation of the constitution?
Disney’s Hotel California.5th gate CONFIRMED!!! You just have to be incarcerated to get in.
But isn't it an own goal if it just makes him look stupid?I'm not sure if you watched it live, or read the reporting on it after the fact. I watched the whole thing live, and it was extremely clear that he was joking.
You would think we'd be familiar with this pattern by now.
It was bait. A troll. It wasn't a bona fide policy proposal. You can still say "baiting and trolling are bad" without resorting to the hyperbole that he literally wants to build a prison at Walt Disney World.
- Say something that's mildly controversial and probably inappropriate while maintaining plausible deniability.
- Watch the media completely overreact.
- Fundraise and campaign on #2 to great success because #2 is so disproportionate that it pushes #1 out of the news cycle.
No it's just 5D chess!But isn't it an own goal if it just makes him look stupid?
People were laughing at him for being outsmarted by Disney, so he floats the idea of building a prison at Disney World so people laugh at him some more?
Twitter isn't real life. He just won reelection with 60% of the vote in what used to be a swing state.But isn't it an own goal if it just makes him look stupid?
People were laughing at him for being outsmarted by Disney, so he floats the idea of building a prison at Disney World so people laugh at him some more?
So I guess you’re now upset over the corporate welfare that Disney’s Orlando competitors are receiving, yes?Benefits don't have to take the form of cash to be "welfare." Eliminating red tape for one entity over another is still corporate welfare.
Lets hope this keeps up.Interesting to see that 'Disney' is the #2 trending topic on Twitter in the USA right now, and it's mainly people laughing at DeSantis for threatening to build a prison at Walt Disney World and talking about the general insanity of the whole situation.
He isn't running for governor of Florida anymore.Twitter isn't real life. He just won reelection with 60% of the vote in what used to be a swing state.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.