mikejs78
Premium Member
This motion is not yet showing on the Clerk of Court’s website. It seems like an odd strategy as it treats the state law as valid. Disney has essentially opened the door for the District to make changes and start doing things with their property.
I think this motion is brilliant. They make a compelling argument on motion to dismiss. At all costs, Disney wants to avoid a state court ruling against them, and wants this in federal court. A federal ruling would win out, but federal courts are also very deferential to state court rulings. A finding that the contracts were invalid because they weren't properly executed would somewhat harm Disney's case. A finding tthat the contracts are invalid because the legislature says so plays right into Disney's federal case. So a dismissal for mootness seems to be exactly what they need - and short of that, a stay, which FL law at least from this reading seems very clear about.
Disney hired good lawyers.