News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

LAKid53

Official Member of the Girly Girl Fan Club
Premium Member
I agree. I’m not saying it’s ideal. It would hurt the business. I’m not saying it will happen. The statement was made that they cannot move WDW from the state….that is true. Another statement was made that they cannot move the cruise business from the state.……that is not true. It would take time and some serious investment but it could be done.

Then Disney Cruise Line will end up killing the 3 night Caribbean cruise. Which is very popular. Won't happen.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
Anaheim has yet to try and revoke the Disneyland Resort’s development agreement, undo the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan or the Anaheim Resort District. The closest they got was a threat around 2007/8 to allow housing in the Resort District since Disney was slowing down promised investment in the wake of Disney’s California Adventure’s failures. Eastern Gateway was a poorly designed project that ran into trouble during the process it had to go through. There were no efforts to try and hinder projects that confirmed to the existing zoning.

The hotel tax credit was a pretty expensive debacle for Disney, tying minimum wage increases to an already approved project resulted in the project being cancelled after they’d already cancelled leases and spent millions on designs.

There’s challenges everywhere, you can’t run away from bureaucracy.

2 years ago FL looked like the perfect business state, now look at what they’re dealing with, moving doesn’t guarantee anything.
 
Last edited:

mmascari

Well-Known Member
I said IF... "...If Disney only wants to invest in solidly Blue states, that will pose some challenges." I never said they did, just opined that if it became a desire, it would be difficult.
Quite literally, nobody has even suggested Disney wants to do that. What has been suggested and discussed is how Disney could react to a state becoming hostile beyond a breaking point to the company. Disney wanting to operate in a state that is not actively hostile to them isn't some stretch of imagination and doesn't matter if it's Red, Blue, Purple, or Chartreuse for that matter.

just that if the state puts a gun to their head and makes it bad enough that they don’t want to do business there anymore that’s part of the business that could be moved. WDW is virtually impossible to move.

I think a more likely move would be to replace the state leadership. Not some nefarious action to literally replace them overnight, but an active campaign to support and help replacements in government while hurting the chances of the current state government to get reelected.

The fight today is a skirmish. It's not the war. All of the actions we see Disney taking, even the federal lawsuit, are measured responses to the threat the new RCID board poses. Just like the development agreement and covenants were a measured response to the district being dissolved or a new board taking control of it.

Disney has the resources of a multi national mega corporation and multiple media outlets that can be leveraged directly against a political figure to show them in a bad light. That can be leveraged indirectly though pacs and supporting outside organizations to support a candidate. For that matter, they can do research and searches to find candidates. None of that is guarantee that their choice will win, but it's one huge thumb on the scale pushing an outcome.

Compared to the cost of trying to move out of FL, the cost to change who is governing the state is probably cheap. Who knows, maybe it's $17B over 10 years. 🤔

I don't think Disney is ready for that type of action yet. But, if all else fails and that is all they are left with, that's what I would expect.

Clearly, some of us would prefer they just jumped to the end and did this now. Disney however is not in any rush and seems to be content to mitigate each individual issue as it arises instead.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
The hotel tax credit was a pretty expensive debacle for Disney, tying minimum wage increases to an already approved project resulted in the project being cancelled after they’d already cancelled leases and spent millions on designs.

There’s challenges everywhere, you can’t run away from bureaucracy.
The wage issue was the result of a referendum. Even a pro-Disney council would have had to deal with that result.
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
A little further North of what the OP was referring to. IMHO they were referring to the St Mary's Estuary with would be off limits due to a small but important Naval Base, Kings Bay which is home to Trident ICBM carrying submarines.
What a sight that would probably never happen. A guest with a balcony stateroom taking a video of a Trident submarine surfacing next to the Magic.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
The wage issue was the result of a referendum. Even a pro-Disney council would have had to deal with that result.

Which is a good example of how moving doesn’t guarantee anything, even if the government is friendly the voters can still muck things up.

I’m not arguing blue/red is better/worse, just saying moving somewhere for greener pastures is not a realistic solution because things change. FL was a very business friendly state, still is if you aren’t on the Governors bad side, but nothings guaranteed.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Decisions are made by those who show up. If 35% of a population votes and someone gets 51% of those votes they are in charge.

Yes, actual Votes decide elections - But the problem here is not the election, but people taking election results to mean support for something completely different and on top of that misrepresent what the election results actually represent.
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
Then Disney Cruise Line will end up killing the 3 night Caribbean cruise. Which is very popular. Won't happen.
I think you are missing the point which I guess is my fault for not being clear. This is not a debate on what will or won’t happen. In a more extreme example, if the Governor won and just flat out banned Disney from operating in the state (forget about arguing the legality of that, it’s a hypothetical) the WDW assets would be an almost total loss. It would cost more to move most of the stuff than just start over new somewhere else. The cruise business could be moved. They wouldn’t just abandon the ships and bankrupt the business line. Would it be easy? No. Would it be more profitable? No. But if they had to do it having the ships somewhere else and giving up the 3 night cruise is better than nothing.
 

Fordlover

Active Member
If cruises out of the Ports of Houston and New Orleans were so attractive, there'd be a ship there pretty much year round. There's not.
I'm sure you know this since you seem well versed on the cruising world, but the cruise terminal is technically in Galveston, not Houston. I've long since wished Disney would put a boat here, but clearly they know it makes more money elsewhere. For me it means I'll never take the family on a Disney cruise, because I have zero interest flying to/from a cruise ship, when we have decent alternatives a quick car ride away.
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
Then please show your work. Where are these alternative ports of call that make this idea anything more than silly fan fiction?
They already cruise from ports outside of FL. It’s not an idea. Nobody is suggesting they want to move the cruise business or will look to move. It was a very simple concept that if they had to they could move it. They cannot move WDW.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Nitpicking about voter turnout seems somewhat irrelevant to me.

Decisions are made by those who show up. If 35% of a population votes and someone gets 51% of those votes they are in charge.

The issue here is a politician who is acting against the best interest of the state/constituents, and is specifically doing so because he sees it as benefitting his desire to get a promotion.

Not to mention doing things that appear to be blatantly unconstitutional to all but the most partisan Nitpicking about voter turnout seems somewhat irrelevant to me.
i only discuss it because our Governor likes to publicly make statements about his actions being the will of the people of Florida and how Disney attempting to defend their own interests and rights is somehow putting their thumb in the eyes of the people of Florida.

I don’t think most of the people in this state are paying close enough attention to even understand what’s going on.

And plenty that do don’t agree with him on what he is doing here.

… Contrary to how certain people want to spin it.
 
Last edited:

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
I'm sure you know this since you seem well versed on the cruising world, but the cruise terminal is technically in Galveston, not Houston. I've long since wished Disney would put a boat here, but clearly they know it makes more money elsewhere. For me it means I'll never take the family on a Disney cruise, because I have zero interest flying to/from a cruise ship, when we have decent alternatives a quick car ride away.
Some are different. Many fellow guests I met cruising on the Wonder flew in from many states into MCO a week, days or the night before boarding the ship in FL.
 

LuvtheGoof

DVC Guru
Premium Member
I only point it out because this guy would already be stretching the truth pretty slim when he talks about the “will of the people” or “Disney putting their thumb in the eye of the people of Florida, etc., considering nobody booted for what he’s doing here.
Every single thing he has stated about this has been a total lie, not just stretching the truth.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom