News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

JAB

Well-Known Member
Funny, I guess openly held meetings are “quietly contrived”.
The repetition of false talking points by the board, etc. is getting sad at this point.

Board: "Disney had secret 11th-hour meetings the night before the bill passed!"

Person with facts: "The process was started months earlier and openly discussed in publicly noticed meetings, and all of it is a matter of public record."

Board (sticking their fingers in their ears): "ELEVENTH HOUR!!!!"
 

RamblinWreck

Well-Known Member
22. Then, on February 8, 2023, two days after the filing of HB 9 signaled that Disney's absolute rule over the District would soon come to an end, Disney quietly contrived with its puppet Board to extend Disney's governmental powers by contract.

They seem really committed to the hope that no judge in the process knows how a bill becomes a law. Thankfully Disney has a catchy song that can help them learn!
This is just embarrassing language to use in an official legal filing, as well.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
They seem really committed to the hope that no judge in the process knows how a bill becomes a law. Thankfully Disney has a catchy song that can help them learn!
…like schoolhouse rock? 🤔
1682980234875.jpeg
 

Patcheslee

Well-Known Member
The two that keep bugging me cause I've read it a couple times: 1663.3223 says "may" not shall. So can that be interpreted as optional vs required?

They cite 163.3220(4l) but leave out
163.3220(5) that states
"Sections 163.3220-163.3243 shall be regarded as supplemental and additional to the powers conferred upon local governments by other laws and shall not be regarded as in derogation of any powers now existing" Does that mean this doesn't take away their ability to enter into development agreements due to other existing laws?

Any input from people with better education
 

mkt

When a paradise is lost go straight to Disney™
Premium Member
Took a peek at the judge in the CFTOD v Disney lawsuit. Rick Scott appointee, Federalist society member, went to a fourth tier law school (the worst).

I get major Aileen Cannon vibes for her, but even less competent. It'll be interesting.
 

scottieRoss

Well-Known Member
other points that the Board Attornies seems to have missed:
Chapter 14 RCID Charter (Again State Law)
-The District shall have the power to exercise any of its rights, powers, privileges and authorities in any and all portions of the District lying within the boundaries of the City of Bay Lake, the City of Reedy Creek, and any other municipal corporation or other political subdivision, heretofore or hereafter created or organized, whose boundaries lie wholly or partly within the geographic limits of the District, to the same extent and in the same manner as in areas of the District not incorporated as part of a municipality or other political subdivision.
Kind of destroys that whole argument about the cities and their development plans.

And of course Chapter 21
The District shall have the power to enter into agreements with any person, firm or corporation for the furnishing by such person, firm or corporation of any facilities and services of the type provided for in this Act to the District, and for or on behalf of the District to persons, firms, corporations and other public or private bodies and agencies to whom the District is empowered under this Act to furnish facilities and services
So there goes dealings with Disney

And as for anything else we have section 2
In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Act and the provisions of any other law, now existing or hereafter enacted, the provisions of this Act shall control to the extent of any such conflict unless such enactment shall specifically repeal or amend the provisions of this Act.
 

Smiley/OCD

Well-Known Member
22. Then, on February 8, 2023, two days after the filing of HB 9 signaled that Disney's absolute rule over the District would soon come to an end, Disney quietly contrived with its puppet Board to extend Disney's governmental powers by contract.

They seem really committed to the hope that no judge in the process knows how a bill becomes a law. Thankfully Disney has a catchy song that can help them learn!
And it was just on a few months ago…
 

Chi84

Premium Member
This part caught my eye:

Lack of Consideration
The only purported consideration that Disney provided through the Development Agreement was its agreement to demand no more than fair market value for Disney-owned lands that the District might need for any public-facilities projects that Disney may obligate the District to undertake pursuant to the Development Agreement. But the District already had the power to take private lands for public projects and to pay only fair market value for those lands.​

Without adequate consideration by both parties, the contact is unenforceable.

Any thoughts from those who have read the entire development agreement?
I haven’t read the entire agreement but lack of consideration is almost always a losing argument.
 

JAB

Well-Known Member
"...eleventh-hour deals with its soon-to-be-replaced puppet government."
"...quietly contrived with its puppet Board..."

The sheer hypocrisy of a group of people with absolutely no municipal administration qualifications who were hand-picked by the Governor specifically to do his bidding in his war against Disney calling RCID "puppets" is mind-boggling.
 

RamblinWreck

Well-Known Member
"...eleventh-hour deals with its soon-to-be-replaced puppet government."
"...quietly contrived with its puppet Board..."

The sheer hypocrisy of a group of people with absolutely no municipal administration qualifications who were hand-picked by the Governor specifically to do his bidding in his war against Disney calling RCID "puppets" is mind-boggling.
The irony was not lost on me either 😂

But also it’s just pointless and embarrassing language. It doesn’t help the case at all.
 

mikejs78

Premium Member
I realize that courts don't get involved in determining relative value but in this case, CFTOD is claiming it received nothing that it didn't already have. CFTOD is claiming the district received no consideration.

For those who have read the development agreement, are there other considerations?

Couldn't Disney argue that they will provide lands at fair market value without the bar needed for eminent domain? And does a development agreement *need* consideration?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom