There's an interesting dissection of Disney's suit on Youtube by the Legal Mindset channel who actually has a specialization in Florida Special District and real property law and has practiced as such. He brings up the point that if it's Disney, not the former district, that is asserting this as a First Amendment case that due to the disclosures on the bond debt they are committing securities fraud. Disney, in its filing, admits that the replacement for RCID is the current legal authority for that district.
The matter of the Bonds is what will cause Disney the most problems in the legal court system, not the court of public opinion where anything can bring up as "evidence" and shills can pump out as many "ground swell opinion pieces" as funds as made available to produce and publish them.